[issue36765] Invalid grammar for f_expression

Eric V. Smith added the comment: Thanks, Serhiy. I suppose that we could add a note to the documentation, but I'm not sure it would be worth the confusion it would create. It's best to think of this is "it's just an expression, like everywhere else in Python". If I ever decide I like PEP

[issue36765] Invalid grammar for f_expression

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Concur with Eric. The formal definition of the Python grammar is wider than valid Python, because we do not want to make it too complex. Invalid constructions are filtered out later. -- nosy: +serhiy.storchaka

[issue36765] Invalid grammar for f_expression

Eric V. Smith added the comment: I don't think this is a problem. There are plenty of things allowed by Python's grammar that are converted to errors in subsequent passes. For example: >>> *[1] File "", line 1 SyntaxError: can't use starred expression here >>> *[1],*[2] (1, 2) --

[issue36765] Invalid grammar for f_expression

Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan : -- nosy: +eric.smith ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue36765] Invalid grammar for f_expression

Kasra Vand added the comment: Due to the discussion in following SO question https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55933956/what-does-a-star-asterisk-do-in-f-string/55934472#55933956 and the inconsistency of the source behaviour with the documentation I think using `"*" or_expr` for

[issue36765] Invalid grammar for f_expression

New submission from Kasra Vand : Due to the discussion in following SO question https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55933956/what-does-a-star-asterisk-do-in-f-string/55934472#55933956 and the inconsistency of the source behaviour with the documentation I think using `"*" or_expr` for