[issue36947] Fix 3.3.3.1 Metaclasses Documentation

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Thank you Josh. -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue36947] Fix 3.3.3.1 Metaclasses Documentation

Josh Rosenberg added the comment: The existing documentation is correct, just hard to understand if you don't already understand the point of metaclasses (metaclasses are hard, the language to describe them will be inherently a little klunky). At some point, it might be nice to write a

[issue36947] Fix 3.3.3.1 Metaclasses Documentation

Change by Serhiy Storchaka : -- status: pending -> open title: [Good first issue] Fix 3.3.3.1 Metaclasses Documentation -> Fix 3.3.3.1 Metaclasses Documentation ___ Python tracker

[issue36947] Fix 3.3.3.1 Metaclasses Documentation

Stéphane Wirtel added the comment: Thank you for your report -- assignee: -> docs@python components: +Documentation nosy: +docs@python, matrixise ___ Python tracker ___

[issue36947] Fix 3.3.3.1 Metaclasses Documentation

New submission from Nicholas Matthews : Currently the final sentence of the second paragraph reads: "In the following example, both MyClass and MySubclass are instances of Meta:" It should read something like: "In the following example, both MyClass and MySubclass have the metaclass Meta, and