[issue37689] Add Path.is_relative_to()

Change by Antoine Pitrou : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue37689] Add Path.is_relative_to()

Antoine Pitrou added the comment: New changeset 82642a052dc46b2180679518bc8d87e1a28a88b5 by Antoine Pitrou (Hai Shi) in branch 'master': bpo-37689: add Path.is_relative_to() method (GH-14982) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/82642a052dc46b2180679518bc8d87e1a28a88b5 --

[issue37689] Add Path.is_relative_to()

Change by Brett Cannon : -- nosy: +brett.cannon ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue37689] Add Path.is_relative_to()

Change by STINNER Victor : -- nosy: -vstinner ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue37689] Add Path.is_relative_to()

hai shi added the comment: Hi, Antoine, pls review this PR if you have free time. Looks is_relative_to only catch valueError is good enough. -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue37689] Add Path.is_relative_to()

Change by hai shi : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +14749 stage: needs patch -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/14982 ___ Python tracker

[issue37689] Add Path.is_relative_to()

hai shi added the comment: antoine, let me try it;) -- nosy: +shihai1991 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue37689] Add Path.is_relative_to()

New submission from Antoine Pitrou : Right now, to know whether a Path is relative to another one, you have to call Path.relative_to(), catch ValueError, and act in consequence. It would be nice to have a Path.is_relative_to() that does the equivalent for you and returns True/False. This is