[issue3769] Deprecate bsddb for removal in 3.0

Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: I accidentally filed this twice, and the code review is on the other issue, so setting the superceder and closing (although the patch has not been applied yet). -- resolution: fixed -> duplicate superseder: -> deprecate bsddb/dbhash in

[issue3769] Deprecate bsddb for removal in 3.0

Changes by Barry A. Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: -- resolution: rejected -> fixed ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ ___ Python-b

[issue3769] Deprecate bsddb for removal in 3.0

Jesús Cea Avión <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: This issue is closed but "rejected". Should it be marked as "accepted" or "fixed"?. ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ ___

[issue3769] Deprecate bsddb for removal in 3.0

Skip Montanaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: me> If not, could a dbm.sqlite module be written for 2.7 and 3.1 which me> can fill that role? http://bugs.python.org/issue3783 S ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[issue3769] Deprecate bsddb for removal in 3.0

Jesús Cea Avión <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nick Coghlan wrote: > While that will still be visible to some degree due to the presence of > the 2.x version of the bsddb code in Python 2.6, I don't think it will > be quite the same as it wou

[issue3769] Deprecate bsddb for removal in 3.0

Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Raymond Hettinger wrote: > I think this should be deferred to Py3.1. > This decision was not widely discussed and I think it likely that some > users will > be surprised and dismayed. The release > candidate seems to be the wrong time to > yank

[issue3769] Deprecate bsddb for removal in 3.0

Jesús Cea Avión <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Brett Cannon wrote: >> Also, the reason for removal may yet disappear >> if jcrea steps in an continues to make updates. > > OK, but none of his changes have received a code review, so if we are

[issue3769] Deprecate bsddb for removal in 3.0

Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Since SQLite has a blob type and allows text keys, we should be able to make a substitute that doesn't depend on bsddb. Against, recommend holding-off on removal until 3.1 so we can bake in a reasonable substitute (esp. for shelves where d

[issue3769] Deprecate bsddb for removal in 3.0

Skip Montanaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Is there going to be a dbm.* module which is supported across all the core platforms: Windows, Mac & Unix? I don't count dumbdbm as really all that useful, especially given the caveats listed in the module docstring. If not, could a dbm.sqli

[issue3769] Deprecate bsddb for removal in 3.0

Barry A. Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: See http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-July/081362.html Guido states his opinion in no uncertain terms regarding pybsddb in Python 3.0: "+1. In my recollection maintaining bsddb has been nothing but trouble right from the star

[issue3769] Deprecate bsddb for removal in 3.0

Changes by Benjamin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: -- priority: release blocker -> deferred blocker ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ __

[issue3769] Deprecate bsddb for removal in 3.0

Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: >> I think this should be deferred to Py3.1. >> This decision was not widely discussed and I think >> it likely that some users will be surprised and dismayed. > Perhaps, but that could be said about almost any module > that has been rem

[issue3769] Deprecate bsddb for removal in 3.0

Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 4:41 PM, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think this should be deferred to Py3.1. > This decision was not widely discussed and I think it likely that some users > will > be surprised and dismayed. Perhaps,

[issue3769] Deprecate bsddb for removal in 3.0

Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: I think this should be deferred to Py3.1. This decision was not widely discussed and I think it likely that some users will be surprised and dismayed. The release candidate seems to be the wrong time to yank this out (in part because of

[issue3769] Deprecate bsddb for removal in 3.0

Changes by Benjamin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: -- nosy: +barry ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailin

[issue3769] Deprecate bsddb for removal in 3.0

Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: New patch to also deprecated dbhash. Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11367/deprecate_bsddb.diff ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __

[issue3769] Deprecate bsddb for removal in 3.0

Changes by Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file11366/deprecate_bsddb.diff ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___

[issue3769] Deprecate bsddb for removal in 3.0

Benjamin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Also see this: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/2008-September/014712.html ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ __

[issue3769] Deprecate bsddb for removal in 3.0

Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: I thought someone stepped forward to maintain this package. -- nosy: +rhettinger ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___

[issue3769] Deprecate bsddb for removal in 3.0

Benjamin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Skip Montanaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Skip Montanaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > > Remind me why we want to get rid of bsddb? The reasons are enumerated in PEP 3108. > > Skip > > ---

[issue3769] Deprecate bsddb for removal in 3.0

Skip Montanaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Remind me why we want to get rid of bsddb? Skip -- nosy: +skip.montanaro ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ _

[issue3769] Deprecate bsddb for removal in 3.0

Benjamin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: I also think you need to deprecate the dbhash module. -- nosy: +benjamin.peterson ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __

[issue3769] Deprecate bsddb for removal in 3.0

New submission from Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Attached is a patch that deprecates bsddb for removal in 3.0. -- components: Library (Lib) files: deprecate_bsddb.diff keywords: needs review, patch, patch messages: 72431 nosy: brett.cannon priority: release blocker severity: normal