[issue37852] Pickling doesn't work for name-mangled private methods

2019-08-15 Thread Josh Rosenberg
Change by Josh Rosenberg : -- resolution: -> duplicate stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed superseder: -> Objects referencing private-mangled names do not roundtrip properly under pickling. ___ Python tracker

[issue37852] Pickling doesn't work for name-mangled private methods

2019-08-15 Thread Zackery Spytz
Zackery Spytz added the comment: This seems like a duplicate of bpo-33007. -- nosy: +ZackerySpytz ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue37852] Pickling doesn't work for name-mangled private methods

2019-08-14 Thread Karthikeyan Singaravelan
Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan : -- nosy: +pitrou ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue37852] Pickling doesn't work for name-mangled private methods

2019-08-14 Thread Josh Rosenberg
New submission from Josh Rosenberg : Inspired by this Stack Overflow question, where it prevented using multiprocessing.Pool.map with a private method: https://stackoverflow.com/q/57497370/364696 The __name__ of a private method remains the unmangled form, even though only the mangled form