[issue37966] is_normalized is much slower at "no" than the standard's algorithm

STINNER Victor added the comment: Thanks Greg Price for this nice optimization! -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue37966] is_normalized is much slower at "no" than the standard's algorithm

miss-islington added the comment: New changeset 4dd1c9d9c2bca4744c70c9556b7051f4465ede3e by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.8': closes bpo-37966: Fully implement the UAX GH-15 quick-check algorithm. (GH-15558)

[issue37966] is_normalized is much slower at "no" than the standard's algorithm

Maxime Belanger added the comment: Thanks for that! -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue37966] is_normalized is much slower at "no" than the standard's algorithm

Change by miss-islington : -- pull_requests: +15335 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/15671 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue37966] is_normalized is much slower at "no" than the standard's algorithm

Benjamin Peterson added the comment: New changeset 2f09413947d1ce0043de62ed2346f9a2b4e5880b by Benjamin Peterson (Greg Price) in branch 'master': closes bpo-37966: Fully implement the UAX #15 quick-check algorithm. (GH-15558)

[issue37966] is_normalized is much slower at "no" than the standard's algorithm

Change by STINNER Victor : -- nosy: +serhiy.storchaka ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue37966] is_normalized is much slower at "no" than the standard's algorithm

Greg Price added the comment: Fix posted, as GH-15558. Adding cc's for the folks in the thread on #32285, where this function was originally added. -- components: +Unicode nosy: +Maxime Belanger, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, steven.daprano, vstinner title: is_normalized is much