Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Cleanup done in r84464 (py3k), r84465 (3.1).
--
resolution: - fixed
stage: - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
versions: +Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 3.0
___
Python tracker
Changes by Georg Brandl ge...@python.org:
--
assignee: janssen - pitrou
nosy: +pitrou
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3805
___
___
Bill Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Please, guys, let's not deep-end on this. It's an admittedly eccentric but
working and purely internal interface. There are actual release-blockers
that need to be addressed.
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:14 AM, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL
Changes by Bill Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file11446/unnamed
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3805
___
___
Bill Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
But I should say... Greg, I do appreciate the review and the comments.
I was waiting for the bytes work in 3K to settle down before looking at
that code again. When I do, I'll take your comments to heart.
Gregory P. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
yep, agreed. leave this for later. my bad for opening it with high
priority in the first place. low is correct. :)
i was just trying to write down comments on odd code that i came across
before i forgot about it.
New submission from Gregory P. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Modules/_ssl.c in the py3k branch:
PySSL_SSLread():
calls parsetuple expecting |Oi as arguments.
However the logic below to interpret and use the arguments is very
convoluted. it'd be better to reorder these as |iO to match the api
in
Bill Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
There was a reason to do it that way. Now if I can only remember what
it was...
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3805
___
Changes by Bill Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
priority: high - low
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3805
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
Gregory P. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
i only had a brief look when i was going through code looking for
potentially incorrect uses of PyByteArray_*.
I've got a patch that i believe cleans it up a little but its sitting on
a machine i don't have remote access to at the moment.
10 matches
Mail list logo