[issue3910] 2.6 regression in socket.ssl method

Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: OK, I found the fix. -- resolution: -> fixed status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___

[issue3910] 2.6 regression in socket.ssl method

Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Maybe not. test_ssl hangs when I run it "-u all -v". It's hanging on testSimpleSSLWrap. This is on OS X 10.5.5. ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___

[issue3910] 2.6 regression in socket.ssl method

Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Will do. ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubsc

[issue3910] 2.6 regression in socket.ssl method

Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: It looks like no one objected. Can you check this in, Bill? -- nosy: +brett.cannon ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ __

[issue3910] 2.6 regression in socket.ssl method

Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Looks OK to me. I think this is a back-port problem from 3.0. I'll put it in if no one objects. -- assignee: -> janssen ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __

[issue3910] 2.6 regression in socket.ssl method

Gregory P. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: This makes sense and is a trivial compatibility fix. anyone disagree? -- nosy: +gregory.p.smith, janssen priority: -> release blocker ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[issue3910] 2.6 regression in socket.ssl method

New submission from jan matejek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: python 2.6's compatibility socket.ssl() method does not handle 'sock' parameter in the same way. in 2.5, ssl() looked like this: def ssl(sock, keyfile=None, certfile=None): if hasattr(sock, "_sock"): sock = sock._sock return _