[issue39112] Misleading documentation for tuple

2019-12-28 Thread Terry J. Reedy
Change by Terry J. Reedy : -- resolution: -> duplicate stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed superseder: -> Fix some class entries in 'Built-in Functions' ___ Python tracker

[issue39112] Misleading documentation for tuple

2019-12-28 Thread Karthikeyan Singaravelan
Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment: Thanks Terry, I guess it's a duplicate of issue34118 . -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue39112] Misleading documentation for tuple

2019-12-27 Thread Terry J. Reedy
Terry J. Reedy added the comment: I believe that this is a duplicate issue. As noted before, filter, map, reversed, and zip are classes, but they return iterators and are documented differently. -- nosy: +terry.reedy versions: -Python 3.5, Python 3.6

[issue39112] Misleading documentation for tuple

2019-12-23 Thread Karthikeyan Singaravelan
Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment: FWIW, built-in types page has the class prefix : https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#tuple . Similar difference between range in the two pages. -- nosy: +xtreak ___ Python tracker

[issue39112] Misleading documentation for tuple

2019-12-20 Thread Simon Berens
New submission from Simon Berens : Sorry if this is a silly question (my first bug report), but it seems that https://docs.python.org/3/library/functions.html#func-tuple should say "class tuple" instead of just "tuple", as list, dict, and set do. -- assignee: docs@python components: