[issue39939] PEP 616: Add str.removeprefix and str.removesuffix methods

STINNER Victor added the comment: New changeset de6b6841098e1a5967cb7a50b665ca7473d0ddad by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.9': bpo-39939: Fix removeprefix issue number in the What's New in Python 3.9 (GH-20473) (GH-20474) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/de6b6841098e1a5967cb7a50b6

[issue39939] PEP 616: Add str.removeprefix and str.removesuffix methods

Change by miss-islington : -- nosy: +miss-islington nosy_count: 9.0 -> 10.0 pull_requests: +19727 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/20474 ___ Python tracker

[issue39939] PEP 616: Add str.removeprefix and str.removesuffix methods

STINNER Victor added the comment: New changeset 56853d8ec6ed89bf5a9b81c3781a4df46ac391d3 by Elazar Gershuni in branch 'master': bpo-39939: Fix removeprefix issue number in the What's New in Python 3.9 (GH-20473) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/56853d8ec6ed89bf5a9b81c3781a4df46ac391

[issue39939] PEP 616: Add str.removeprefix and str.removesuffix methods

Change by Elazar Gershuni : -- nosy: +elazar nosy_count: 8.0 -> 9.0 pull_requests: +19726 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/20473 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue39939] PEP 616: Add str.removeprefix and str.removesuffix methods

STINNER Victor added the comment: > This should be unrelated to the patch, right? It's unrelated. It smells like bpo-39995. -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue39939] PEP 616: Add str.removeprefix and str.removesuffix methods

Dennis Sweeney added the comment: There's a failure here: https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/64/builds/656 Failed subtests: test_killed_child - test.test_concurrent_futures.ProcessPoolSpawnProcessPoolExecutorTest Traceback (most recent call last): ... OSError

[issue39939] PEP 616: Add str.removeprefix and str.removesuffix methods

STINNER Victor added the comment: Well done Dennis Sweeney! You got a PEP approved and now the implementation is merged! Maybe the documentation will need more reviews, but that can be done later. I prefer to get the implementation merged as soon as possible (it will likely be part of the