Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Warning added for georg's issue, all doc errors fixed on trunk, py3k and
2.6.1 maint. see r67419
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Fixed applyAsync and missing ] in r67335.
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4012
___
___
Erick Tryzelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
fyi, the multiprocessing docs also refer to applyAync, but the function
was renamed to apply_async. This is also in the python 3.0 docs.
--
nosy: +erickt
versions: +Python 3.0
___
Python tracker
osvenskan [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
The Synchronization primitives section should mention that
sem_timedwait() isn't supported under OS X =10.5.5 (and possibly later
versions) so as a result timeouts passed to acquire() will be ignored
(or raise an error?)
Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
fix_up_logger doesn't exist in the port, but is used in the mp_distributing.py
example
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4012
___
David Ripton [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Also, two of the example code blurbs in that page still refer to the
module as processing instead of multiprocessing. (Search for
import processing to find them.)
--
nosy: +dripton
___
Python tracker
Changes by Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
assignee: georg.brandl - jnoller
nosy: +jnoller
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4012
___
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
There's also an applyAsync left in the introductory Pool example.
Jesse, while you're at it, could you please add a blurb that some
examples won't work when tried at the interactive interpreter (and
perhaps also why)?
Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Which examples are you talking about Georg?
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4012
___
___
Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Also, several things which are properties are still referred to as methods
and include the () chars for the call
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4012
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I e.g. tried a minimal example with Pool.map():
from multiprocessing import Pool
p = Pool(5)
def f(x):
... return x*x
...
p.map(f, [1,2,3])
Process PoolWorker-1:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Ok, let me take a look at that
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4012
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Kent Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Which examples are you talking about Georg?
I think you mean me, not Georg...I was referring to the example that
New submission from Kent Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In the docs for AsyncResult
http://docs.python.org/dev/library/multiprocessing.html#multiprocessing.pool.AsyncResult
get([timeout) is missing a ]
In the example following, it refers to pool.applyAsync() in two places;
the docs spell this
14 matches
Mail list logo