[issue41107] Running a generator in a map-like manner

Raymond Hettinger added the comment: FWIW, you can already do this with map() and deque(): deque(map(f, it), maxsize=0) -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue41107] Running a generator in a map-like manner

Natsumi H. added the comment: If it won't be added do you reckon creating a library to solve this issue would be appropriate? -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue41107] Running a generator in a map-like manner

Rémi Lapeyre added the comment: I don't think something so obvious can be added, if you want a one liner you can write: for e in iterable: f(e) I think it would go in itertools if it were accepted. -- nosy: +rhettinger ___ Python tracker

[issue41107] Running a generator in a map-like manner

Natsumi H. added the comment: Exactly that was the plan! -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue41107] Running a generator in a map-like manner

Change by Rémi Lapeyre : -- components: +Library (Lib) -Interpreter Core ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue41107] Running a generator in a map-like manner

Rémi Lapeyre added the comment: If I'm understanding correctly you want: def xmap(f, iterable): for e in iterable: f(e) Is that correct? -- nosy: +remi.lapeyre ___ Python tracker

[issue41107] Running a generator in a map-like manner

New submission from Natsumi H. : I suggest adding a function which behaves like map but without returning anything to iterate over a generator. This is useful in cases where you need to run a function on every element in a list without unnecessarily creating a generator object like map