[issue41277] documentation: os.setxattr() errno EEXIST and ENODATA

Change by Eric V. Smith : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue41277] documentation: os.setxattr() errno EEXIST and ENODATA

Change by miss-islington : -- pull_requests: +24485 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/25795 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue41277] documentation: os.setxattr() errno EEXIST and ENODATA

Change by miss-islington : -- nosy: +miss-islington nosy_count: 5.0 -> 6.0 pull_requests: +24484 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/25794 ___ Python tracker

[issue41277] documentation: os.setxattr() errno EEXIST and ENODATA

Eric V. Smith added the comment: Sorry, ZackerySpytz. I saw PR 25742 first and reviewed and merged it before I saw that you have an earlier PR on this issue. -- nosy: +eric.smith ___ Python tracker

[issue41277] documentation: os.setxattr() errno EEXIST and ENODATA

Change by Roundup Robot : -- nosy: +python-dev nosy_count: 3.0 -> 4.0 pull_requests: +24432 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/25742 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue41277] documentation: os.setxattr() errno EEXIST and ENODATA

Change by Zackery Spytz : -- keywords: +patch nosy: +ZackerySpytz nosy_count: 2.0 -> 3.0 pull_requests: +24286 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/25567 ___ Python tracker

[issue41277] documentation: os.setxattr() errno EEXIST and ENODATA

Change by Irit Katriel : -- assignee: -> docs@python components: +Documentation nosy: +docs@python ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue41277] documentation: os.setxattr() errno EEXIST and ENODATA

New submission from Pablo Dumas : Shouldn't os.setxattr() errno EEXIST be when "XATTR_CREATE was specified, and the attribute exists already" and errno ENODATA be when "XATTR_REPLACE was specified, and the attribute does not exist."? In the current os module documentation, it's the other way