[issue42611] PEP 594 Removing dead batteries from stdlib

Terry J. Reedy added the comment: Until a pep is approved, discussion of its ideas belong elsewhere; an issue is only needed for a proposed implementation Is PR 23728 purely for discussion leading to possible approval of the PEP, or for merging regardless of the PEP fate? -- nosy:

[issue42611] PEP 594

Change by Batuhan Taskaya : -- nosy: +BTaskaya ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue42611] PEP 594

Change by Jeremy Kloth : -- nosy: +jkloth ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue42611] PEP 594

New submission from Kyle Stanley : This issue was created for the purpose of tracking any changes related to PEP 594 (Removing dead batteries from stdlib), and any relevant discussions about the modules being removed. -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 382815 nosy: aeros,