[issue4371] coerce gone---but not from docs

2008-11-21 Thread Benjamin Peterson
Benjamin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Thanks for the suggestions. Done in r67324 and r67311. -- nosy: +benjamin.peterson resolution: -> fixed status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[issue4371] coerce gone---but not from docs

2008-11-20 Thread David W. Lambert
Changes by David W. Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: -- assignee: -> georg.brandl components: +Documentation nosy: +georg.brandl versions: +Python 3.0 ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _

[issue4371] coerce gone---but not from docs

2008-11-20 Thread David W. Lambert
New submission from David W. Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/glossary.html Scanning the glossary reveals... coercion The glossary needs rewritten to eliminate "coerce builtin". __future__ Uses example import division, I'd replace it but I don't know w