[issue44819] assertSequenceEqual does not use _getAssertEqualityFunc

Irit Katriel added the comment: Closing as duplicate of issue22452. -- stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue44819] assertSequenceEqual does not use _getAssertEqualityFunc

Change by Irit Katriel : -- resolution: -> duplicate superseder: -> addTypeEqualityFunc is not used in assertListEqual ___ Python tracker ___

[issue44819] assertSequenceEqual does not use _getAssertEqualityFunc

Brian added the comment: I've attached an example of what I want. It contains a class, a function to be tested, and a test class which tests the function. What TestCase.addTypeEqualityFunc feels like it offers is a chance to compare objects however I feel like is needed for each test.

[issue44819] assertSequenceEqual does not use _getAssertEqualityFunc

Irit Katriel added the comment: That's correct, and apparently not mentioned in the doc: https://docs.python.org/3/library/unittest.html#unittest.TestCase.assertSequenceEqual -- nosy: +ezio.melotti, iritkatriel, michael.foord, rbcollins ___ Python

[issue44819] assertSequenceEqual does not use _getAssertEqualityFunc

Jack DeVries added the comment: Brian, can you be more specific about what problem is caused by the fact that assertSequenceEqual does not use _getAssertEqualityFunc? Also, I'm not sure what your example is trying to demonstrate. Can you provide a minimal example that shows the problem, but

[issue44819] assertSequenceEqual does not use _getAssertEqualityFunc

New submission from Brian : Like the title says, TestCase.assertSequenceEqual does not behave like TestCase.assertEqual where it uses TestCase._getAssertEqualityFunc. Instead, TestCase.assertSequenceEqual uses `item1 != item2`. That way I can do something like this: ``` def