[issue46640] Python can now use the C99 NAN constant or __builtin_nan()

STINNER Victor added the comment: PEP 7 has been updated, I close the issue. -- status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue46640] Python can now use the C99 NAN constant or __builtin_nan()

Petr Viktorin added the comment: > IMO this PEP is outdated for a long time. It is not. Even if it is, it should be marked as such, and that is not a decision that should be done in this issue. Please, don't break the rules because you think they're outdated. > Well, if you ask me, I would

[issue46640] Python can now use the C99 NAN constant or __builtin_nan()

STINNER Victor added the comment: > Well, if you ask me, I would simply require a C99 compiler. That's all :-) Done in https://github.com/python/peps/pull/2309 -- ___ Python tracker

[issue46640] Python can now use the C99 NAN constant or __builtin_nan()

STINNER Victor added the comment: > Adding new C99 features needs a change in PEP 7 > (https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0007/#c-dialect) IMO this PEP is outdated for a long time. C99 standard is wide. Do we have to explicitly list every single function, macro or constant used by Python?

[issue46640] Python can now use the C99 NAN constant or __builtin_nan()

Petr Viktorin added the comment: Adding new C99 features needs a change in PEP 7 (https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0007/#c-dialect) -- nosy: +petr.viktorin status: closed -> open ___ Python tracker

[issue46640] Python can now use the C99 NAN constant or __builtin_nan()

STINNER Victor added the comment: I merged my change, thanks for the reviews. -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed title: Python can now use the C99 NAN constant -> Python can now use the C99 NAN constant or __builtin_nan()