New submission from Fabio Zadrozny fab...@users.sourceforge.net:
sys.exc_clear() does not seem to exist in Python 3.0 anymore, so, a way
to deal with it should be provided (maybe put a #TODO comment and point
to somewhere explaining what happened?).
--
components: 2to3 (2.x to 3.0
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
There should be no need for sys.exc_clear() anymore. What are you trying
to achieve?
--
nosy: +pitrou
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4719
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
In any case, probably a documentation issue :))
--
assignee: - georg.brandl
components: +Documentation -2to3 (2.x to 3.0 conversion tool)
nosy: +georg.brandl
priority: - normal
type: - behavior
___
Fabio Zadrozny fab...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
When created it was already marked as a 2to3 issue (in the components),
so, for clarity, yes: it's a 2to3 issue (what should the user do with
that when porting... I think that the 2to3 should do something regarding
that... maybe just
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Le lundi 22 décembre 2008 à 12:48 +, Fabio Zadrozny a écrit :
Fabio Zadrozny fab...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
When created it was already marked as a 2to3 issue
Oops, sorry.
(because that was needed
just to clear the
Benjamin Peterson musiccomposit...@gmail.com added the comment:
Actually, I think this should just get a Py3k warning in 2.6 and 2.7.
2to3 doesn't deal with anything else that has been removed.
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Fabio Zadrozny fab...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
2to3 doesn't deal with anything else that has been removed.
That seems a bit odd for me... isn't it the perfect place for that? (it
doesn't even need to change the code for a pass, but it could give the
user some warning about it
Benjamin Peterson musiccomposit...@gmail.com added the comment:
In fact, there is already a Py3k warning for sys.exc_clear(). I'm still
not convinced that 2to3 should play a role. What should it do? Simply
remove the call? I'm apprehensive about trying to guess the intention of
the user.
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
If this is already handled by the -3 flag then I agree it's not a bug.
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4719
___
Changes by Benjamin Peterson musiccomposit...@gmail.com:
--
resolution: - wont fix
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4719
___
10 matches
Mail list logo
