Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com added the comment:
And we're back in PEP 291 !
see r70019, r70017 and r70021
--
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5052
Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com added the comment:
ok the current trunk won't run even under 2.5...
I will make two small changes:
- use md5 module of haslib is not found
- make the smallest possible change for site.USER_BASE
and site.USER_SITE usage
--
nosy: +christian.heimes
Changes by Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com:
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file13197/2.3.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5052
___
Marc-Andre Lemburg m...@egenix.com added the comment:
Some more explanation for why keeping distutils Python 2.3 compatible is
desirable:
distutils was removed from the PEP without any public discussion outside
a sprint at PyCon and the reasons given for it did not take into account
that people
Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com added the comment:
Ok, I will rewrite the top README file to explain this (and PEP 291 as
well) and keep the Python 2.3 compatibility in the whole package.
--
status: closed - open
title: This module should be kept compatible with Python 2.1. in
Akira Kitada akit...@gmail.com added the comment:
Is there any PEP describing we have to keep compatibility with 2.3
release? I'm not against the idea but just curious.
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5052
