[issue5209] nntplib needs updating to RFC 3977

Martin Panter added the comment: General RFC 3977 support was added as part of Issue 9360 (revision 0077ee30134c), so I am closing this one. For the record there are a couple bits of the patch that someone might still find useful: * New NNTP(bind=...) parameter * More lenient checking for succ

[issue5209] nntplib needs updating to RFC 3977

Julien ÉLIE added the comment: > +Whether posting is allowed depends on whether it > +is included in results of CAPABILITIES; see > +RFC 3977 section 5.1.2. > +Deprecated: > If the response code is 200, posting is allowed; > if it 201, posting is

[issue5209] nntplib needs updating to RFC 3977

Changes by Éric Araujo : -- nosy: +jelie, pitrou versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 3.0 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing

[issue5209] nntplib needs updating to RFC 3977

Travis Hassloch added the comment: Attached is a difference which implements CAPABILITIES and MODE READER and leaves some TODO comments for other RFC 3977 commands. -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file13020/nntplib.diff ___ Pyt

[issue5209] nntplib needs updating to RFC 3977

New submission from Travis Hassloch : RFC 977 has been obsoleted by RFC 3977 Numerous new commands, standardized extensions, clarifications. -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 81587 nosy: travis severity: normal status: open title: nntplib needs updating to RFC 3977 type: feature re