[issue5406] asyncore doc issue

Georg Brandl added the comment: Closing as "works for me". -- nosy: +georg.brandl resolution: -> works for me status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ _

[issue5406] asyncore doc issue

Giampaolo Rodola' added the comment: You're right, my fault. -- message_count: 3.0 -> 4.0 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue5406] asyncore doc issue

Josiah Carlson added the comment: Well...the loop can also die if an uncaptured exception is raised, but I'm not sure that is necessary to spell out explicitly. -- message_count: 2.0 -> 3.0 ___ Python tracker

[issue5406] asyncore doc issue

Josiah Carlson added the comment: Actually, that's exactly what it does. If the count is missing, it defaults to None. The code that is executed is exactly: if count is None: while map: poll_fun(timeout, map) It will loop until the map is empty. -- message_c

[issue5406] asyncore doc issue

New submission from Giampaolo Rodola' : About asyncore.loop()'s count parameter: > The count parameter defaults to None, resulting in the loop > terminating only when all channels have been closed This is incorrect and it's not what count parameter actually does. I'd come up with a patch but I