[issue5501] Update multiprocessing docs re: freeze_support

2016-01-07 Thread Roundup Robot
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset f08d4712a055 by Berker Peksag in branch '3.5': Issue #5501: Clarify that invoking freeze_support() on non-Windows platforms has no effect https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/f08d4712a055 New changeset 2902f32d1ae9 by Berker Peksag in branch 'default'

[issue5501] Update multiprocessing docs re: freeze_support

2015-12-28 Thread Camilla Montonen
Camilla Montonen added the comment: Patch review: 3.X patch: Applied to docs locally in the default branch(3.6). Docs build passes, doc layout has not been broken. Applied to branch 3.5. Docs build passes, doc layout has not been broken. 2.X patch: Applied to docs locally in the 2.7 branch.

[issue5501] Update multiprocessing docs re: freeze_support

2015-12-16 Thread Davin Potts
Changes by Davin Potts : -- nosy: +rhettinger ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.pytho

[issue5501] Update multiprocessing docs re: freeze_support

2015-12-16 Thread Davin Potts
Changes by Davin Potts : Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file41331/issue_5501_explicit_freeze_support_nonWin_v3x.patch ___ Python tracker ___ _

[issue5501] Update multiprocessing docs re: freeze_support

2015-12-16 Thread Davin Potts
Davin Potts added the comment: Thank you, Winterflower, for the nudge to see this set right. In truth, invoking multiprocessing.freeze_support() has zero effect on platforms other than Windows. This should be reflected in the 2.7 docs as well as the 3.x docs that are still actively being upda

[issue5501] Update multiprocessing docs re: freeze_support

2015-12-11 Thread Berker Peksag
Changes by Berker Peksag : -- nosy: +davin ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.o

[issue5501] Update multiprocessing docs re: freeze_support

2015-12-09 Thread Camilla Montonen
Camilla Montonen added the comment: Hi everyone! It has been a while since this issue has been updated. The addition requested by Brandon Corfman is a simple clarification of what happens when the freeze_support function from multiprocessing is called on non-Windows platforms (if I understand

[issue5501] Update multiprocessing docs re: freeze_support

2010-10-04 Thread Éric Araujo
Éric Araujo added the comment: Rephrased: Is this relevant for 3.1? (Bug and doc fixes go into 3.2, 3.1 and 2.7, but here only 3.2 and 2.7 are selected, so I asked if the bugfix/new feature/behavior in question was something new in 3.2 and thus not in 3.1.) -- __

[issue5501] Update multiprocessing docs re: freeze_support

2010-10-04 Thread Sandro Tosi
Sandro Tosi added the comment: Sorry Éric, I don't get it: do you mean that the fact that "freeze_support() can be called without issues on Unix or OS X" is a new feature? or I misread it completely? -- ___ Python tracker

[issue5501] Update multiprocessing docs re: freeze_support

2010-10-01 Thread Éric Araujo
Éric Araujo added the comment: I’m assuming this is a feature new in 2.7 and 3.2, please add 3.1 if this is wrong. -- nosy: +d...@python, eric.araujo ___ Python tracker ___

[issue5501] Update multiprocessing docs re: freeze_support

2010-10-01 Thread Sandro Tosi
Sandro Tosi added the comment: Hello, well it's just 3 words that can clarify the situation, so maybe just add them would be nice Regards, Sandro -- nosy: +sandro.tosi ___ Python tracker _

[issue5501] Update multiprocessing docs re: freeze_support

2010-08-31 Thread Ask Solem
Changes by Ask Solem : -- nosy: +asksol ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/m

[issue5501] Update multiprocessing docs re: freeze_support

2010-08-07 Thread Terry J. Reedy
Changes by Terry J. Reedy : -- versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list U

[issue5501] Update multiprocessing docs re: freeze_support

2010-08-07 Thread Terry J. Reedy
Terry J. Reedy added the comment: I think that question is covered by "If the module is being run normally by the Python interpreter then freeze_support() has no effect." Jesse, do you think anything more is needed, like '(on any platform)' after 'interpreter', or should be close this? -

[issue5501] Update multiprocessing docs re: freeze_support

2009-03-29 Thread Jesse Noller
Changes by Jesse Noller : -- priority: -> low ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.pytho

[issue5501] Update multiprocessing docs re: freeze_support

2009-03-17 Thread Jesse Noller
Changes by Jesse Noller : -- assignee: georg.brandl -> jnoller ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: h

[issue5501] Update multiprocessing docs re: freeze_support

2009-03-17 Thread Brandon Corfman
New submission from Brandon Corfman : Indicate in docs whether freeze_support() can be called without issues on Unix or OS X, so the user knows whether they can have a single code base that works correctly on all platforms. -- assignee: georg.brandl components: Documentation messages: 83