[issue558238] Pickling bound methods

2010-08-02 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: Let's continue the discussion on issue9276. -- nosy: -merwok resolution: -> duplicate status: open -> closed superseder: -> pickle should support methods ___ Python tracker __

[issue558238] Pickling bound methods

2010-08-02 Thread Éric Araujo
Changes by Éric Araujo : -- nosy: +merwok ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.o

[issue558238] Pickling bound methods

2010-07-16 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: See also issue3657. For some reasons, C bound methods aliased as module globals can be pickled, but not similarly aliased Python bound methods: >>> random.random, random.seed (, >) >>> pickle.dumps(random.random) b'\x80\x03crandom\nrandom\nq\x00.' >>> pickle.d

[issue558238] Pickling bound methods

2009-06-29 Thread Alexandre Vassalotti
Changes by Alexandre Vassalotti : -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/ma

[issue558238] Pickling bound methods

2009-06-28 Thread obamausa8
obamausa8 added the comment: This is an interesting discussion.. thank you for sharing. [url=http://pret-auto.org][color=#FF][u]pret auto[/u][/color][/url] -- nosy: +obamausa8 ___ Python tracker __

[issue558238] Pickling bound methods

2009-06-28 Thread Alexandre Vassalotti
Alexandre Vassalotti added the comment: I am leaving this issue open for now. I reconsidered whether we should add pickle support for methods and I now think it would probably be a good idea. For example, the multiprocessing module would benefit from a having built-in support for method picklin

[issue558238] Pickling bound methods

2008-04-26 Thread Alexandre Vassalotti
Changes by Alexandre Vassalotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: -- status: open -> pending Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Python-bugs-list mai

[issue558238] Pickling bound methods

2008-04-26 Thread Alexandre Vassalotti
Alexandre Vassalotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Personally, I don't see how adding this feature would create a security hole (or more properly said, grow the giant hole that are the GLOBAL and REDUCE opcodes). I don't see either why this should be included in the standard library. U