[issue6098] xml.dom.minidom incorrectly claims DOM Level 3 conformance

2010-07-25 Thread Mark Lawrence
Mark Lawrence added the comment: Could someone with minidom experience please comment on this, thanks. -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy versions: +Python 3.1 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue6098] xml.dom.minidom incorrectly claims DOM Level 3 conformance

2010-10-14 Thread karl
karl added the comment: The source of 3.1/lib/python3.1/xml/dom/__init__.py is correct === minidom -- A simple implementation of the Level 1 DOM with namespace support added (based on the Level 2 specification) and other minor Level 2 functionality. === E

[issue6098] xml.dom.minidom incorrectly claims DOM Level 3 conformance

2010-10-15 Thread Georg Brandl
Georg Brandl added the comment: Applied in r85547. -- nosy: +georg.brandl resolution: -> fixed status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue6098] xml.dom.minidom incorrectly claims DOM Level 3 conformance

2009-05-24 Thread Philipp Hagemeister
New submission from Philipp Hagemeister : >From DOM Level 3[1]: "An implementation conforms to a DOM Level 3 module if it supports all the interfaces for that module and the associated semantics.". minidom supports only some Level 3 functions such as Node.renameNode, Element.setIdAttribute*, Text