[issue6377] distutils compiler switch ignored

2021-02-03 Thread Steve Dower
Steve Dower added the comment: Distutils is now deprecated (see PEP 632) and all tagged issues are being closed. From now until removal, only release blocking issues will be considered for distutils. If this issue does not relate to distutils, please remove the component and reopen it. If

[issue6377] distutils compiler switch ignored

2015-04-02 Thread Jean-Paul Calderone
Changes by Jean-Paul Calderone jean-p...@clusterhq.com: -- nosy: -exarkun ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6377 ___ ___

[issue6377] distutils compiler switch ignored

2014-07-09 Thread Mark Lawrence
Changes by Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk: -- versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.1 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6377 ___

[issue6377] distutils compiler switch ignored

2010-12-13 Thread R. David Murray
Changes by R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com: -- nosy: +eric.araujo stage: - unit test needed type: - behavior ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6377 ___

[issue6377] distutils compiler switch ignored

2009-12-15 Thread Craig McQueen
Changes by Craig McQueen ces-...@mcqueen.id.au: -- nosy: +cmcqueen1975 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6377 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue6377] distutils compiler switch ignored

2009-11-02 Thread Tarek Ziadé
Changes by Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +dalcinl ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6377 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue6377] distutils compiler switch ignored

2009-09-07 Thread Tarek Ziadé
Changes by Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com: -- priority: - high ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6377 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue6377] distutils compiler switch ignored

2009-07-12 Thread Tarek Ziadé
Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com added the comment: I think a workable solution to the problem with the compiler option would be to remove the option from the build_ext, build_clib and config commands (plus any others, if there are more) and only allow it on the build command. The problem

[issue6377] distutils compiler switch ignored

2009-07-10 Thread Tarek Ziadé
Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com added the comment: @Nicolas : That's because you run it with Python 2.6 distutils, which doesn't have that change. If you want to build the current trunk with Python 2.6, you may want to install a standalone version of distutils. I have a nightly build of the

[issue6377] distutils compiler switch ignored

2009-07-10 Thread Tarek Ziadé
Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com added the comment: You never run a command twice unless you explicitly reinitialize it (which then resets .compiler to None and then fetches the command line option again), so the above is not a problem. In practice yes that's true. The compiler option on

[issue6377] distutils compiler switch ignored

2009-07-10 Thread Marc-Andre Lemburg
Marc-Andre Lemburg m...@egenix.com added the comment: Tarek Ziadé wrote: The compiler option on the build_ext and config commands are not really needed. Their .finalize_options() methods could easily pull in the build option value and place it into an .compiler_type attribute which then gets

[issue6377] distutils compiler switch ignored

2009-07-09 Thread Marc-Andre Lemburg
Marc-Andre Lemburg m...@egenix.com added the comment: Tarek Ziadé wrote: Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com added the comment: I'll set back the compiler attribute when compiler_obj is set too, so third-party code will be able to work with it as before. The current code will deprecate

[issue6377] distutils compiler switch ignored

2009-07-09 Thread Tarek Ziadé
Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com added the comment: The build_ext command cannot be run twice, because the first time, the compiler option may be set to unix for example, or left to None, and then is transformed into a compiler object. That's the bug. If you call it again, it'll break because

[issue6377] distutils compiler switch ignored

2009-07-09 Thread Marc-Andre Lemburg
Marc-Andre Lemburg m...@egenix.com added the comment: Tarek Ziadé wrote: Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com added the comment: The build_ext command cannot be run twice, because the first time, the compiler option may be set to unix for example, or left to None, and then is transformed into

[issue6377] distutils compiler switch ignored

2009-07-09 Thread Marc-Andre Lemburg
Marc-Andre Lemburg m...@egenix.com added the comment: FWIW: I've changed our mxSetup code to use a method for accessing the compiler instance. Perhaps that's the better way to go for standard distutils commands as well ?! E.g. .get_compiler_object() --

[issue6377] distutils compiler switch ignored

2009-07-09 Thread Nicolas Dumazet
Nicolas Dumazet nicd...@gmail.com added the comment: It seems that the fix is still not perfect. At the moment ( r73906 ), if you try to build trunk using Python 2.6, you get: python setup.py build running build running build_ext Traceback (most recent call last): File setup.py, line 1901,

[issue6377] distutils compiler switch ignored

2009-07-08 Thread Jean-Paul Calderone
Jean-Paul Calderone exar...@divmod.com added the comment: It looks like this change may have broken some parts of distutils. For example, Twisted's setup.py now produces this output when running the build_ext command: $ ~/Projects/python/trunk/python setup.py build_ext running build_ext

[issue6377] distutils compiler switch ignored

2009-07-08 Thread Marc-Andre Lemburg
Marc-Andre Lemburg m...@egenix.com added the comment: Tarek, the .compiler attribute is needed by bdist_ext, so cannot just be removed or renamed to .compiler_obj. There's a lot of bdist_ext distutils code out there relying on having the .compiler object available. A much better fix would be to

[issue6377] distutils compiler switch ignored

2009-07-08 Thread Marc-Andre Lemburg
Marc-Andre Lemburg m...@egenix.com added the comment: Note that the config command also uses a .compiler instance for actually doing work, rather than as command option. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6377

[issue6377] distutils compiler switch ignored

2009-07-08 Thread Marc-Andre Lemburg
Marc-Andre Lemburg m...@egenix.com added the comment: Added Python 2.7 since it fails there as well. -- versions: +Python 2.7 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6377 ___

[issue6377] distutils compiler switch ignored

2009-07-08 Thread Marc-Andre Lemburg
Marc-Andre Lemburg m...@egenix.com added the comment: Marc-Andre Lemburg wrote: Tarek, the .compiler attribute is needed by bdist_ext, so cannot just be removed or renamed to .compiler_obj. There's a lot of bdist_ext distutils code out there relying on having the .compiler object available.

[issue6377] distutils compiler switch ignored

2009-07-08 Thread Roumen Petrov
Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info added the comment: Trunk may be is not affected. I successfully cross-compile with GNU compiler for windows (see issue 3871). -- nosy: +rpetrov ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue6377] distutils compiler switch ignored

2009-07-08 Thread Marc-Andre Lemburg
Marc-Andre Lemburg m...@egenix.com added the comment: Roumen Petrov wrote: Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info added the comment: Trunk may be is not affected. I successfully cross-compile with GNU compiler for windows (see issue 3871). It is affected in the sense that .compile was

[issue6377] distutils compiler switch ignored

2009-07-08 Thread Tarek Ziadé
Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com added the comment: I'll set back the compiler attribute when compiler_obj is set too, so third-party code will be able to work with it as before. The current code will deprecate this usage, by displaying a deprecation warning: - if the compiler is set to

[issue6377] distutils compiler switch ignored

2009-07-08 Thread Tarek Ziadé
Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com added the comment: done in r73895, r73896. (and tested with twisted trunk). -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6377 ___

[issue6377] distutils compiler switch ignored

2009-07-08 Thread Jean-Paul Calderone
Jean-Paul Calderone exar...@divmod.com added the comment: Cool, thanks. PyCrypto also works again now. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6377 ___

[issue6377] distutils compiler switch ignored

2009-07-06 Thread Tarek Ziadé
Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com added the comment: done in r73864, waiting for the buildbots to build trunk, then will be applied in 3.x -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6377

[issue6377] distutils compiler switch ignored

2009-07-06 Thread Tarek Ziadé
Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com added the comment: merged in r73866 in py3k Thanks for the feedback -- status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6377 ___

[issue6377] distutils compiler switch ignored

2009-07-05 Thread Tarek Ziadé
Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com added the comment: Here's the patch. There's no simple way to deprecate the usage of compiler as an attribute, so I have just fixed Python setup.py. Using it as an attribute is just wrong. I have put Benjamin in the loop and I'll wait for his greenlight to

[issue6377] distutils compiler switch ignored

2009-07-05 Thread Benjamin Peterson
Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org added the comment: I think the patch is fine. (Did you try using the descriptor protocol to add a deprecation warning?) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6377

[issue6377] distutils compiler switch ignored

2009-07-05 Thread Tarek Ziadé
Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com added the comment: Right, turning compiler into a property and adding a warning on the set would be good enough I guess. Then turn it back into a simple string for python 3.3 and ... 2.8 :) I'll add that -- ___

[issue6377] distutils compiler switch ignored

2009-07-03 Thread Tarek Ziadé
Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com added the comment: yes, the problem is that this option (string) is also used as an attribute (compiler object). But Python itself uses as an attribute.. I have to check its type at this spot, and deprecate the usage of compiler as an attribute. --

[issue6377] distutils compiler switch ignored

2009-06-29 Thread Anthony Tuininga
New submission from Anthony Tuininga anthony.tuini...@gmail.com: With the release of Python 3.1 the --compiler switch is ignored in Lib/distutils/command/build_ext.py. The attached patch fixes that issue. Once that was fixed there was another issue with get_version() in cygwincompiler but that