Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
$ ./python
Python 2.7.2+ (2.7:27ae7d4e1983+, Oct 23 2011, 00:09:06)
[GCC 4.6.1] on linux2
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
import shlex
shlex.split(u'Hello, World!')
['Hello,', 'World!']
This was fixed indirectly
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
The discussion pretty much says this was a feature request, which is obsolete
for 2.x. Not an issue for 3.x:
import shlex
shlex.split('Hello, World!' )
['Hello,', 'World!']
--
nosy: +tjreedy
resolution: - out of date
status: open -
New submission from Bill Fenner fen...@gmail.com:
In python 2.5, shlex handled unicode input fine:
Python 2.5.1 (r251:54863, Jun 15 2008, 18:24:51)
[GCC 4.3.0 20080428 (Red Hat 4.3.0-8)] on linux2
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
import shlex
shlex.split(
Bill Fenner fen...@gmail.com added the comment:
A colleague pointed out that the bad behavior was introduced in 2.5.2:
Python 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Sep 30 2008, 15:42:03)
[GCC 4.3.2 20080917 (Red Hat 4.3.2-4)] on linux2
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
import shlex
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc amaur...@gmail.com added the comment:
I'll take the opposite point of view:
the bad behavior was introduced with 2.5.1 (issue1548891, r52302), and
reverted for 2.5.2 because it broke backwards compatibility with
arbitrary read buffers (issue1730114, r53831)
The difference
Bill Fenner fen...@gmail.com added the comment:
so, just to be clear, your position is that the output of shlex.split(
u'Hello, World!' ) is *supposed* to be
['H\x00\x00\x00e\x00\x00\x00l\x00\x00\x00l\x00\x00\x00o\x00\x00\x00,\x00\x00\x00',
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Hm, while the StringIO behaviour supposedly cannot be changed for
backwards-compatibility reasons, we can probably improve shlex behaviour
with unicode strings.
--
nosy: +pitrou
___
Python tracker
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc amaur...@gmail.com added the comment:
(Presented this way, my opinion becomes difficult to stand...
OTOH the docs say that the module does not support Unicode, so it's not
strictly a bug)
http://docs.python.org/library/shlex.html
Yes, shlex could be improved and encode
Marc-Andre Lemburg m...@egenix.com added the comment:
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc wrote:
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc amaur...@gmail.com added the comment:
(Presented this way, my opinion becomes difficult to stand...
OTOH the docs say that the module does not support Unicode, so it's not
strictly a
Bill Fenner fen...@gmail.com added the comment:
Sorry, I didn't read the web documentation, only the module
documentation, which doesn't mention Unicode. I'd agree that since it's
a documented behavior, this bug can become:
- an RFE for shlex to handle Unicode
- meanwhile, if there will be any
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +ezio.melotti
priority: - normal
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue6988
___
11 matches
Mail list logo
