Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com added the comment:
This discussion is taken to distutils-SIG, and a PEP 345 update is being
worked out there. (look for 'RFC PEP 345' in Distutils archives)
I am closing this issue and proposes that we continue there.
--
status: open - closed
anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com added the comment:
Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com added the comment:
Yes but fixing this inconsitency can be done on either side:
A - remove the maintainer and maintainer_email
B - add the Maintainer and Maintainer-email in the metadata
If we don't
Marc-Andre Lemburg m...@egenix.com added the comment:
anatoly techtonik wrote:
anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com added the comment:
Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com added the comment:
Yes but fixing this inconsitency can be done on either side:
A - remove the maintainer and
anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Marc-Andre Lemburg
rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
Please, be specific. PyPi maintainer or trac-plugin package maintainer
or debian package maintainer? Which should be mentioned in debian
package for a
Marc-Andre Lemburg m...@egenix.com added the comment:
anatoly techtonik wrote:
anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Marc-Andre Lemburg
rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
Please, be specific. PyPi maintainer or trac-plugin package maintainer
Marc-Andre Lemburg m...@egenix.com added the comment:
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com added the comment:
I'm just suggesting to add the meta-data field in order to recreate
consistency - not advocating that setup() parameter or its use.
Yes but fixing this
anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com added the comment:
I wonder what does Guido think about this bikeshed?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue6992
___
Dariusz Suchojad ds...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
Hello,
funny the bug report should surface in the very same time I was looking
for a way to put 2 authors in the 'author' field :-)
[Antoine Pitrou (pitrou)]
It is still unknown what use case the new author scheme would solve
