[issue7095] Multiprocessing.Array(lock=False) fails

2009-10-09 Thread Jesse Noller
Changes by Jesse Noller : -- resolution: -> duplicate status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue7095] Multiprocessing.Array(lock=False) fails

2009-10-09 Thread Jesse Noller
Jesse Noller added the comment: Gabriel is right, I'm really hoping Apple includes an upgrade including 2.6.4 once it's buttoned down -- ___ Python tracker ___ _

[issue7095] Multiprocessing.Array(lock=False) fails

2009-10-09 Thread Gabriel Genellina
Gabriel Genellina added the comment: Fixed in r68708 - upgrading to 2.6.2 should solve this. -- nosy: +gagenellina ___ Python tracker ___

[issue7095] Multiprocessing.Array(lock=False) fails

2009-10-09 Thread schlesin
schlesin added the comment: Happens both on Python 2.6 (r26:66714, Jul 25 2009, 11:30:23) [GCC 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-44)] on linux2 and Python 2.6.1 (r261:67515, Dec 6 2008, 16:42:21) [GCC 4.0.1 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 5370)] on darwin --

[issue7095] Multiprocessing.Array(lock=False) fails

2009-10-09 Thread Jesse Noller
Jesse Noller added the comment: schlesin - what platform are you on, and what version of 2.6? -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bug

[issue7095] Multiprocessing.Array(lock=False) fails

2009-10-09 Thread Benjamin Peterson
Changes by Benjamin Peterson : -- assignee: -> jnoller nosy: +jnoller ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubsc

[issue7095] Multiprocessing.Array(lock=False) fails

2009-10-09 Thread schlesin
New submission from schlesin : The documentation for the Multiprocessing.Array says: multiprocessing.Array(typecode_or_type, size_or_initializer, *, lock=True)¶ ... If lock is False then access to the returned object will not be automatically protected by a lock, so it will not necessarily be “