Berker Peksag added the comment:
There is an up-to-date patch for Python 3 in issue 747320. Closing this as a
duplicate.
--
nosy: +berker.peksag
resolution: -> duplicate
stage: test needed -> resolved
status: open -> closed
superseder: -> rfc2822 formatdate functionality duplication
karl added the comment:
I think it is now fixed by my patch in http://bugs.python.org/issue747320
--
nosy: +karlcow
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7370
___
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
The HTTP RFCs reference the email RFCs for the date format, so the email
package is the logical place for this function: email is the correct
responsible party. In any case, the function resides in email.utils, which has
no
Changes by Brian Curtin cur...@acm.org:
--
title: patch: BaseHTTPServer reinventing rfc822 date formatting -
BaseHTTPServer reinventing rfc822 date formatting
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7370
