Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
Mark, this kind of message isn't useful.
The general problem here is not whether it is interesting or not, it is whether
it is desireable. My own take is that it would threaten to break existing code,
and that making the proxy *too* transparent would be
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Good to see that people are really interested in this :(
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue749722
___
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
Closed as no reply to msg109729.
--
resolution: - out of date
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue749722
Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org added the comment:
It would be possible now, though perhaps inadvisable, to proxy isinstance and
issubclass.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
resolution: out of date -
status: closed - open
versions: +Python 3.2
___
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
Being seven years old is this request still valid, or has it been overtaken by
events?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue749722
Changes by Daniel Diniz aja...@gmail.com:
--
stage: - test needed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue749722
___
___
Python-bugs-list
