[issue8851] pkgutil document needs more markups

2010-08-21 Thread Éric Araujo
Éric Araujo added the comment: Thanks for the report. Patch looks good to me. I assume the other function descriptions already have complete markup, since your patch touches only two of them. If there are no remarks from d...@python or objections from Georg, I will apply this in a week, taki

[issue8851] pkgutil document needs more markups

2010-05-28 Thread MATSUI Tetsushi
New submission from MATSUI Tetsushi : The library reference of pkgutil is only sparsely marked up. The attached patch is against 2.6 version, because I'm currently working with 2.6. Since a part of markups (namely :pep:'s) has already been done for 3.2 version, the patch cannot be applied dir