Richard Oudkerk added the comment:
How often has this happened?
If the machine was very loaded then maybe the timeout was not enough time for
the semaphore to be cleaned up by the tracker process. But I would expect 1
second to be more than ample
Richard Oudkerk added the comment:
It is probably harmless then.
I don't think increasing the timeout is necessary -- the multiprocessing tests
already take a long time.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20114
Richard Oudkerk added the comment:
The following from the docs is wrong:
... module globals are no longer forced to None during interpreter
shutdown.
Actually, in 3.4 module globals *sometimes* get forced to None during
interpreter shutdown, so the version the __del__ method can still
Richard Oudkerk added the comment:
_overlapped is linked against the socket library whereas _winapi is not so
it can be bundled in with python3.dll.
I did intend to switch multiprocessing over to using _overlapped but I did
not get round to it.
Since this is a private module the names
Richard Oudkerk added the comment:
This is expected. Killing processes which use shared locks is never going to
end well. Even without the lock deadlock, the data in the pipe would be liable
to be corrupted if a processes is killed while putting or getting from a queue.
If you want
Richard Oudkerk added the comment:
LGTM
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20540
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe
Richard Oudkerk added the comment:
BTW, I see little difference between 3.2 and the unpatched default branch on
MacOSX:
$ py-32/release/python.exe ~/Downloads/test_manager.py
0.0007331371307373047
8.20159912109375e-05
9.417533874511719e-05
8.082389831542969e-05
7.796287536621094e-05
Richard Oudkerk added the comment:
On Unix, using the fork start method (which was the only option till 3.4),
every sub process will incref every shared object for which its parent has a
reference.
This is deliberate because there is not really any way to know which shared
objects
Richard Oudkerk added the comment:
Thanks Richard. The set_start_method() call will affect any process
started from that time on? Is it possible to change idea at some point in
the future?
You can use different start methods in the same program by creating different
contexts:
spawn_ctx
Changes by Richard Oudkerk shibt...@gmail.com:
--
assignee: - sbt
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7503
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Changes by Richard Oudkerk shibt...@gmail.com:
--
assignee: - sbt
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20633
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Richard Oudkerk added the comment:
I am not sure method_to_typeid and create_method were really intended to be
public -- they are only used by Pool proxies.
You can maybe work around the problem by registering a second typeid without
specifying callable. That can be used in method_to_typeid
Changes by Richard Oudkerk shibt...@gmail.com:
--
assignee: - sbt
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20990
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Richard Oudkerk added the comment:
We should only wrap the exception with ExceptionWithTraceback in the process
case where it will be pickled and then unpickled.
--
assignee: - sbt
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org
Richard Oudkerk added the comment:
For reasons we all know unpickling unauthenticated data received over TCP is
very risky. Sending an unencrypted authentication key (as part of a pickle)
over TCP would make the authentication useless.
When a proxy is pickled the authkey is deliberately
Changes by Richard Oudkerk shibt...@gmail.com:
--
resolution: - fixed
stage: - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20633
Changes by Richard Oudkerk shibt...@gmail.com:
--
resolution: - fixed
stage: test needed - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20980
Richard Oudkerk added the comment:
Testing the is_forking() requires cx_freeze or something similar, so it really
cannot go in the test suite.
I have tested it manually (after spending too long trying to get cx_freeze to
work with a source build).
It should be noted that on Unix freezing
Richard Oudkerk added the comment:
No, the argument will not go away now.
However, I don't much like the API which is perhaps why I did not get round to
documenting it.
It does have tests. Currently 'xmlrpclib' is the only supported alternative,
but JSON support could be added quite easily
Richard Oudkerk added the comment:
Using asyncio and the IOCP eventloop it is not necessary to use threads.
(Windows may use worker threads for overlapped IO, but that is hidden from
Python.) See
https://code.google.com/p/tulip/source/browse/examples/child_process.py
for vaguely expect
Richard Oudkerk added the comment:
Using truncate() to zero extend is not really portable: it is only guaranteed
on XSI-compliant POSIX systems.
Also, the FreeBSD man page for mmap() has the following warning:
WARNING! Extending a file with ftruncate(2), thus creating a big
hole
Richard Oudkerk added the comment:
I would recommended using _overlapped instead of _winapi.
I intend to move multiprocessing over in future.
Also note that you can do nonblocking reads by starting an overlapped read
then cancelling it immediately if it fails with incomplete. You will
need
Richard Oudkerk added the comment:
I would guess that the problem is simply that LogisticRegression objects are
not picklable. Does the problem still occur if you do not use freeze?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http
Richard Oudkerk added the comment:
Ah, I misunderstood: you meant that it freezes/hangs, not that you used a
freeze tool.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21162
Richard Oudkerk added the comment:
Could you try pickling and unpickling the result of func():
import cPickle
data = cPickle.dumps(func([1,2,3]), -1)
print cPickle.loads(data)
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org
Richard Oudkerk added the comment:
Can you explain why you write in 512 byte chunks. Writing in one chunk should
not cause a deadlock.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1191964
Richard Oudkerk added the comment:
I added some comments.
Your problem with lost data may be caused by the fact you call ov.cancel() and
expect ov.pending to tell you whether the write has/will succeed. Instead you
should use ov.getresult() and expect either success or an aborted error
Richard Oudkerk added the comment:
If you use the short timeouts to make the wait interruptible then you can
use waitformultipleobjects (which automatically waits on an extra event
object) instead of waitforsingleobject.
--
___
Python tracker rep
Changes by Richard Oudkerk shibt...@gmail.com:
--
assignee: - sbt
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20147
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Richard Oudkerk added the comment:
register_after_fork() is intentionally undocumented and for internal use.
It is only run when starting a new process using the fork start method
whether on Windows or not -- the fork in its name is a hint.
--
resolution: - not a bug
stage
Changes by Richard Oudkerk shibt...@gmail.com:
--
assignee: - sbt
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10850
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Richard Oudkerk added the comment:
Since there are no new features added to Python 2, this would be a Python 3
only feature.
I think for Python 3 it is better to concentrate on developing
concurrent.futures rather than multiprocessing.Pool
Changes by Richard Oudkerk shibt...@gmail.com:
--
assignee: - sbt
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21779
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Changes by Richard Oudkerk shibt...@gmail.com:
--
assignee: - sbt
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21664
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Richard Oudkerk added the comment:
Updated version of the patch. Still needs docs.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35902/memoryview-array-value.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14953
Richard Oudkerk added the comment:
I can't remember why I did not use fstat() -- probably it did not occur to me.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue18174
701 - 736 of 736 matches
Mail list logo
