New submission from Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
As reported in http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2011-June/004879.html
urllibs/urllib.request misses the definition of HTTPErrorProcessor class; the
attached patches add it to the documentation.
--
assignee: docs@python
Changes by Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file22553/HTTPErrorProcessor_class-py27.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12479
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
Sorry for the late reply: I've applied Éric comments made on Rietveld.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file22675/shutil_chown-default-v5.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http
Changes by Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7620
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Changes by Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8912
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
Hi,
no it's not a bug :)
What you actually get with [[0]]*3 is a list of 3 references to the same list,
[0]:
a = [[0], [0], [0]]
b = [[0]]*3
for i in a: print(id(i))
...
139807725184032
139807725300280
139807725300520
for i in b: print
Changes by Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
--
resolution: invalid - fixed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12624
___
___
Python
Changes by Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12652
___
___
Python-bugs-list
New submission from Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
Hello, following up http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2011-July/005210.html
, here's a patch to fix it. It applies to all the relevant branches.
--
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation
files
New submission from Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
Hello, following up http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2011-July/005209.html
here's a patch to fix the example error on active 3.x branches.
--
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation
files: dict_view_examples
New submission from Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
Hello, following up http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2011-July/005207.html
here are 2 patches to correct the documentation for 'secure' argument of
SMTPHandler:
- the one for default (applicable also on 3.2) adds completely
Changes by Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
Added file:
http://bugs.python.org/file22811/logging_smtphandler_secure-2.7.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12667
New submission from Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
Hello, following up
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2011-July/005087.html, here's a patch to
fix the 3.2 What's New section.
--
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation
files: whatsnew_3.2_int2str-default.patch
New submission from Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
Hello, following up http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2011-July/004974.html
here's a patch (applicable on 2.7, 3.2 and 3.3) to fix the struct declaration
in the forward declaration example.
--
assignee: docs@python
components
New submission from Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
Hello, following up http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2011-July/005235.html
here's 2 patch (for 3.3 + 3.2 and 2.7) to correct the orientation in the
documentation, using turtle.right instead of turtle.left, since the work
Changes by Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file22819/turtle_right-2.7.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12677
Changes by Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
--
resolution: - fixed
stage: patch review - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12670
Changes by Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
--
resolution: - fixed
stage: patch review - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12665
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
As mentioned by Ezio, and I also verified myself, mode() doesn't influence the
orientation on left()/right() methods (probably it affects some other functs?).
Following was Ezio and I discussed on IRC, I've updated the 2 patches to add
Changes by Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file22835/turtle_right-2.7-v2.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12677
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
Hi Brandon, I really like to see your patch applied, let's see what I can do (I
also added Ezio in the loop).
I think you only addressed half of msg132140 : could you please have a look at
the first Éric's question?
Also, still Éric made
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
Hi Gareth, would you like to provide a patch to fix the bug you spotted and add
the relative case into the testsuite?
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
After a quick chat with Ezio, we tried to revert the changes to copy.py while
keeping the ones on test, and the test suite passes.
The next steps would probably be to just commit the diff for test_copy.py and
see if the changes on copy.py
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
The general rule would be to have separate patches. But in this case, if we
have interdipendent changes, then those should be packed in a single patch
(f.e. if changes to tokenize break untokenize, than those parts should be
joined
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 13:50, Éric Araujo rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
FTR, for Debian and derivatives, doko chose to use 'linux2' when building on
linux3.
Luckily that has just been
Changes by Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file22841/shutil_chown-default-v5.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12191
Changes by Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file22675/shutil_chown-default-v5.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12191
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
Gaaah, sorry about that: I've just uploaded the correct fifth version.
--
nosy: +ezio.melotti
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12191
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
Brandon, thanks for your work on this patch! I've just committed the unittests
update+removal of _test() part.
For the remaining part, I see that Nick and you worked on it during a sprint,
so I'm quite sure it's fine, but nonetheless
Changes by Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12675
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
Hello, the patch seems indeed to fix a reverse description of issue 7902. Was
there a reason (given the quite long list of nosy people) why it was not
applied? lack of time doesn't count :)
--
nosy: +ezio.melotti, sandro.tosi
stage
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
I think the patch is fine to apply.
--
nosy: +ezio.melotti, sandro.tosi
stage: patch review - commit review
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12256
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
A quick reword could be the one attached.
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +ezio.melotti, sandro.tosi
stage: - patch review
versions: +Python 2.7 -Python 3.1
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file22843/issue11481.patch
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
JFTR, the same kind of check of __reduce_ex__ and then falling back on
__reduce__ is prenset in pickle too: maybe it's worth align them?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
After quite a long chat with Ezio, I'm just proposing this updated patch:
- it fixes the copy doc, explicitly acknowledging the use of copyreg
functionalities
- it rewords the first paragraph of copyreg doc, which was a bit too
pickle
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
grepping over the stdlib, LookupError is only used in codecs exception; also
the documentation of LE is The base class for the exceptions that are raised
when a key or index used on a mapping or sequence is invalid: IndexError,
KeyError
Changes by Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
--
resolution: - fixed
stage: patch review - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12677
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
Here attached a very simple patch, made by slightly re-editing the comment in
pystate.h.
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +ezio.melotti, sandro.tosi
stage: - patch review
versions: +Python 3.3 -Python 3.1
Added file: http://bugs.python.org
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
I just committed an improved version of the proposed patch (thanks Ezio for the
review and help!).
--
resolution: - fixed
stage: patch review - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
___
Python
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 00:12, R. David Murray rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
Well, you could consider codecs an example in the stdlib of using it, and the
doc could be changed
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
Would you like to provide a doc patch about it? Thanks in advance
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
stage: - needs patch
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.2, Python 3.3 -Python 3.4
___
Python tracker rep
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
Hello, this is not a but in the python interpreter (f.e., the traceback in the
image is referring to twisted) so I'm closing it as invalid. The best way of
action is contacting the deluge developers, as you did with the other report
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
Here's a patch to add SimpleQueue to doc and __all__ .
I didn't document the 'sentinels' argument of SimpleQueue.get() because I got
lost into Pipe _pool and can't understand how those sentinels are actually
used/useful. Any hint
Changes by Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file22863/issue11836-default.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11836
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
Hynek, thanks for your contribution to Python!
--
resolution: - fixed
stage: needs patch - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
after a review from Ezio (thanks!) we've come out with this updated patch; main
changes are in the test suite, where now it's checked that chown() succeed.
about !r/!a I've left !r; and changed the 2 ValueError in LookupError (the
first
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 16:21, Barry A. Warsaw rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
Barry A. Warsaw ba...@python.org added the comment:
@Sandro:
FTR, for Debian and derivatives, doko chose to use 'linux2' when building
on linux3.
Luckily
Changes by Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +ezio.melotti, sandro.tosi
stage: - commit review
versions: +Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12761
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
Thanks Jakub for the report and Gennadiy for the patch (that I applied on all
the active braches).
--
resolution: - fixed
stage: commit review - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
After a closer look (thanks Ezio), the proper patch should be something like:
diff --git a/Doc/license.rst b/Doc/license.rst
--- a/Doc/license.rst
+++ b/Doc/license.rst
@@ -874,9 +874,8 @@
zlib
-The :mod:`zlib` extension is built
New submission from Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
Following up http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2011-April/004025.html
here's a patch to add a notice about SO_REUSEADDR after the examples, so even
re-running several times and getting that error, wont scare anyone
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
Sure it could be a solution, but I didn't go that way since it *may* complicate
the example (which I see a something to get quick ready to test some code,
there's always time for improvements later). I'm fine either way
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
version 7 here we come :) I've addressed Eric's commenta on rietveld (all but
one, I need input from him) and also updated the tests for new helper functions.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file22949/shutil_chown-default-v7
New submission from Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
following up http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2011-March/003506.html , I
verified that indeed
http://www.xmlrpc.com/discuss/msgReader$1208
is broken. I wrote to d...@scripting.com (the address you get when viewing
http
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
Thanks Ezio for the suggestions.
--
resolution: - fixed
stage: needs patch - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12787
New submission from Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
Following http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2011-June/004727.html I've
updated the mimetypes module doc.
Some changes I would like to do (but I didn't, since I'd like to hear comments):
- move the example of the module before
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
Thanks Drew for the issue and the patch: it has now been committed on all the
active branches!
--
assignee: - sandro.tosi
nosy: +sandro.tosi
resolution: - fixed
stage: patch review - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
Changes by Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11362
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Changes by Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1043134
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
At last, it's in :) thanks a lot to all the people that helped me in the
process!
--
resolution: - fixed
stage: patch review - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep
Changes by Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file23005/unnamed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12409
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
@Fred: thanks about it :)
@Éric: I just want to have clear in mind what you mean; my original proposal
was to move completely, the whole section Documenting python to devguide
since it contains building instructions and how's the markup
New submission from Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
There's no documentation for xml.dom.minicompat - it's a public module and it
should have (even a brief) doc.
--
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation
messages: 142845
nosy: docs@python, sandro.tosi
priority: normal
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
I’m not sure at all this module should be treated as anything but an internal
detail. The docstring of xml.dom only mentions two submodules.
If it's an implementation detail
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
Hi, I just left a very light review on rietveld (the 'review' link below). I
think in the next run you can add the tests for defproperty. Thanks for working
on code coverage!
--
nosy: +ezio.melotti, sandro.tosi
stage: - patch
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
Here attached a new patch incorporating Ezio Eric suggestions.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file23021/mimetypes_doc_update-v2.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http
Changes by Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
--
resolution: - fixed
stage: patch review - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12781
New submission from Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
spinning off msg142613 - it would be interesting to have in the socket module
documentation also an explanation of all the several SO_ flags available; even
a compact table could be ok; or even a link to a remote reference for them
New submission from Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
Given I have no knowledge of the windows system, I'm just proxying
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2011-September/005793.html :
Under: http://docs.python.org/install/index.html#inst-how-install-works
It notes Windows prefix
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
Hi Terry,
the same problem recently came up on docs@ and digging into it, it turned out
that sphinx is currently ignoring doctest directives[1], but that it was fixed
in sphinx 1.1[2].
[1]
https://bitbucket.org/birkenfeld/sphinx/issue/169
Changes by Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12947
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
I'm attaching a very preliminary draft of the howto, any comment is welcome. Of
course, it misses several references to the API doc; I'll see if I can beat
Georg and post a preliminary version of that too :)
--
keywords: +patch
nosy
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
Thank Nick for pointing to Terry's review! I'm attaching here a patch
addressing the points Terry highlighed. probably we should review this patch
before moving forward with the API doc?
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
Thanks Hynek: comments committed
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14814
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
Thanks Lars for the patch! Éric, why did you add 2.7 version? AFAISee 2.7
doesn't have the Inplace Operators section.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14968
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
Attached is a draft of the module documentation. I didn't commit yet cause we
might want to rework it deeply. Else we can just commit the patch and let the
comments coming as additional diffs.
--
stage: needs patch - patch review
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
and the patch...
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file25800/ipaddress_module_doc.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14814
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
Thanks Christopher!
--
resolution: - fixed
stage: - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
versions: -Python 2.7
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14926
New submission from Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
In the smtplib doc I read:
Low-level methods corresponding to the standard SMTP/ESMTP commands HELP,
RSET, NOOP, MAIL, RCPT, and DATA are also supported. Normally these do not need
to be called directly, so they are not documented here
New submission from Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
Hello,
I'm writing some tests from an MTA, and so I'm using smtplib. Sadly the login()
method doesn't allow to choose the auth method to use (but it's selected from a
static list compared with what's advertized from the MTA) while it would
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
Thanks!
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
resolution: - fixed
stage: - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http
New submission from Sandro Tosi:
Hello,
this has been reported at
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2012-July/009223.html but since I have no
experience to judge if it's correct or not, i'll just report it:
I've recenty started to try using C code in python using the wonderful
python API
New submission from Sandro Tosi:
Hello,
it has been reported at
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2012-April/008215.html but given it
raises some question whether it's a bug in the doc or in the code, i'd rather
report the issue here and hear what other think:
In the Python 3.2.2
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
It's fixed in default too: http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/f46b4b7b817c
It was not shown because the commit message misses the issue reference.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org
New submission from Sandro Tosi:
As reported at http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2012-August/009837.html
gzip/zlib allows for a compression level=0 (that's basically no compression) so
the documentation should mention that possibility too.
--
assignee: docs@python
components
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
I tend to agree with Terry that this report can be closed: base 16 is quite
known and it's high likely that if you know what hexadecimal is, you also aware
of the concept of base X and viceversa.
If no-one objects, I'd just close
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Hi Ezio, thanks for the review: how about this new version of the patch? I've
left the more verbose version in the 3.2 example, while used the more compact
way for the 2.7 .
Re first committing to 2.7 then 3.2 and then merge, that would work for doc
patches
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
Éric: I've just committed your patch, with also the latest changes.
Philip: In order to be consistent with the way the documentation is compiled on
the Python platform, the svn checkout must be used: else if you refer to the
upstream website, a contributor can
Sandro Tosi added the comment:
I think the aim of that part of the devguide is to give one clear, simple,
working way to operate on different branches at the same time. Additional
workflows can be presented, but probably in another place (like the FAQ
indeed). What others thing about
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
Hello,
i'm sorry but this is not the right place for this report. Please refer to
ubuntu or gnome user support forum for help.
Sandro
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
resolution: - invalid
stage: - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
Changes by Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
--
components: -None
versions: -Python 2.7
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue13939
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
Thanks Eli for the heads-up, I had missed Antoine's comment!
Antoine, I'm probably missing something, but SimpleQueue is present in 2.7 and
3.2 too, so why not mention it in the doc for those versions too
New submission from Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
At the subject says, several references to Queue are linking to Queue module
and not to multiprocessing.
--
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation
messages: 153218
nosy: docs@python, sandro.tosi
priority: normal
severity
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
It's the way all the subclasses are imported into the main module that got me
in fault, I think. OK, so if I got it correctly, I should document
multiprocessing.queue.SimpleQueue in 2.7 and 3.1 and
multiprocessing.SimpleQueue in 3.3 also
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
OK, so if I got it correctly, I should document
multiprocessing.queue.SimpleQueue in 2.7 and 3.1 [...]
s/3.1/3.2/
yeah, just a typo :)
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
Thanks for all you inputs!
--
resolution: - fixed
stage: patch review - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11836
New submission from Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
I'm providing patches for what reported at
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2012-February/007481.html . I'm not sure
on wording or even if we want them in the tutorial section, but I think it
would be nice to have it documented
Changes by Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file24558/list_sort-py32.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14050
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 01:52, Éric Araujo rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
I’m not entirely sure they are needed (Python code blocks seem to be
autodetected and show up colorized too), but I did it for consistency (and to
make my editor
Changes by Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
--
resolution: - fixed
stage: needs patch - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue13999
301 - 400 of 425 matches
Mail list logo
