In the past two years, I've put a lot of effort into porting the following
to Python 3:
Twisted:
https://www.slideshare.net/CraigRodrigues1/the-onward-
journey-porting-twisted-to-python-3
Buildbot:
https://github.com/buildbot/buildbot/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&;
q=is%3Aclosed%20is%3Apr%20author%3Arodr
s, David
>
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 6:27 AM, Craig Rodrigues
> wrote:
> > In the past two years, I've put a lot of effort into porting the
> following
> > to Python 3:
> >
> > Twisted:
> > https://www.slideshare.net/CraigRodrigues1/the-onward-
>
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 8:02 AM, R. David Murray
wrote:
>
> In response to your posting on core-mentorship Victor mentioned there
> were issues with the proof-of-concept, so figuring out those issues is
> presumably the first step.
>
>
Zach reported his progress of setting up http://buildbot.pyth
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Zachary Ware wrote:
>
> That seems to be a theme with this test instance; pretty much
> everything I click on looks incomplete whether logged in or not, and
> no errors appear in the logs. Is there something missing/broken in
> the configuration?
>
I'm not sure
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 8:02 AM, R. David Murray
wrote:
> The question most relevant to this list is, what are the consequences on
> the slave maintainers? Assuming we convert the master, will the slaves
> be required to run python3/0.9? (That would certainly be desirable,
> but would it be req
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 8:02 AM, R. David Murray
wrote:
>
> In response to your posting on core-mentorship Victor mentioned there
> were issues with the proof-of-concept, so figuring out those issues is
> presumably the first step.
>
>
I've been working with Zach quite a lot,
and I believe we ha
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Victor Stinner
wrote:
>
> By the way, it like the idea of eating our own dog food: migrate from
> Python 2 to Python 3 :-)
> =
I performed some interop testing between Python 2 buildbot worker
and Python 3 buildbot master:
https://lists.buildbot.net/pipermail/d
I'd like to suggest that when we upgrade the buildbot master,
we use a Postgres backend instead of sqlite:
http://docs.buildbot.net/latest/manual/cfg-global.html#postgres
This is for better performance.
Since postgres is involved, this would require coordination with the Python
infra team.
--
C
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Zachary Ware
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Craig Rodrigues
> wrote:
> > I'd like to suggest that when we upgrade the buildbot master,
> > we use a Postgres backend instead of sqlite:
> >
> > http://docs.buildbo
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 1:46 PM, David Bolen wrote:
>
> Over a longer period, I'm curious about the preferences - are there
> concrete benefits in our environment of 0.9 over 0.8 on the worker
> side? E.g., what does upgrading bring on the worker side?
>
On the worker side, the are no performan
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Zachary Ware
wrote:
>
> Craig, is there anything more comparable to
> /waterfall?show=Builder1&show=Builder2 in Buildbot 0.9.x?
>
There is not a 1:1 mapping of that buildbot 0.8 feature to buildbot 0.9,
unfortunately.
It's not the same, but one thing you can do
This page:
https://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/
should probably be changed to from "buildbot slave" to "buildbot worker"
These two wiki pages related to buildbots have really
oudated information:
https://wiki.python.org/moin/BuildBot
* references to "buildbot slave" should be changed to "build
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 1:46 PM, David Bolen wrote:
>
> Oh, and I can offer any of my Windows workers for interoperability
> testing if you'd like me to temporarily configure them to an
> additional master. At least one of them (XP) is probably not worth
> the effort of getting to (a) vs. (b).
>
if that might be the same issue with kloth-win64.
>
> -- David
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Craig Rodrigues
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 1:46 PM, David Bolen wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Oh, and I can offer any of my Windows workers for interope
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:36 PM, David Bolen wrote:
> Does testing include a mixture with a master under 3.x? I only ask since
> I'd guess that a master under 2.x might be sending parameters down as
> strings rather than unicode.
>
I've tested the following combinations of master 3.x <==> work
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 7:57 PM, Berker Peksağ
wrote:
>
>
> Can't we refer people to https://devguide.python.org/buildslave/ and
> update all outdated information there? It looks like the buildbot
> pages on the wiki mostly contain outdated and duplicate information.
>
That sounds like a perfect
I've made these changes to the wiki.
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Craig Rodrigues
wrote:
> This page:
> https://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/
>
> should probably be changed to from "buildbot slave" to "buildbot worker"
>
> These two wiki pages
__Janitor is an internal builder used by buildbot to clean things up:
http://docs.buildbot.net/latest/manual/installation/nine-upgrade.html#data-lifetime
There has been some talk about hiding it from the UI since it can be
confusing to
end-users of buildbot:
https://github.com/buildbot/buildbot/
Buildbot 2.1.0 (which is running at https://buildbot.python.org/all/ )
now supports TLS between a buildbot worker and the buildbot master.
There is an example of setting this up here:
http://docs.buildbot.net/current/manual/installation/worker.html#worker-tls-configuration
For folks interested i
19 matches
Mail list logo
