On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Hirokazu Yamamoto
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you for sweet invitation, python committers!
>
[SNIP]
> Please use [EMAIL PROTECTED] as email address.
You have now been subscribed, Hirokazu.
-Brett
___
python-commi
Thank you for sweet invitation, python committers!
>We've noticed you're very active in the issue tracker and you always seem
>to be able to provide patches when the VC6/VC8 Python builds break
>(Christian Heimes would like to nominate you as the maintainer for the
>VC6/VC8 builds).
Yes, I have V
> I'll put my hand up for doing the Windows build as well (the x64
> buildbot has all the necessary bits and pieces installed). I know
> some HP people that I could rope in to install the resulting IA64
> build and run rt.bat.
Notice that we both look for somebody to build the next 2.6/3.0 betas
>>> I am planning to offer a single file patch for 2.3 and 2.4. As far as
>>> one more 2.5 release, I don't think there's going to be many changes
>>> to the 2.5 branch between now and 2.6/3.0 final - although if there
>>> is, we'll obviously have to do another release.
>
>> I would like to establ
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
If you feel the urgency of doing something now, how about *only*
providing patches for 2.5 at the moment? ActiveState might integrate
them into ActivePython; system vendors can also pick them up
(if they haven't already).
I *could* integrate patches into an ActivePython r
08 08:43
> To: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven
> Cc: python-committers@python.org
> Subject: Re: [python-committers] [Python-Dev] next beta
>
> Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
> > -On [20080812 08:28], "Martin v. Löwis" ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> >> F
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Aug 12, 2008, at 3:38 AM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Anthony Baxter wrote:
I am planning to offer a single file patch for 2.3 and 2.4. As far as
one more 2.5 release, I don't think there's going to be many changes
to the 2.5 branch between now and 2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Aug 12, 2008, at 2:54 AM, Anthony Baxter wrote:
I am planning to offer a single file patch for 2.3 and 2.4.
It shouldn't be hard to build source tarballs, though I also don't
know if it's worth it. We should leave the option open if there's
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
> -On [20080812 08:28], "Martin v. Löwis" ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> For the 2.5, the challenge is to produce AMD64 and Itanium binaries,
>> using vsextcomp (plus the usual problems of collecting all the
>> necessary package
Anthony Baxter wrote:
> I am planning to offer a single file patch for 2.3 and 2.4. As far as
> one more 2.5 release, I don't think there's going to be many changes
> to the 2.5 branch between now and 2.6/3.0 final - although if there
> is, we'll obviously have to do another release.
I would like
-On [20080812 08:28], "Martin v. Löwis" ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>For the 2.5, the challenge is to produce AMD64 and Itanium binaries,
>using vsextcomp (plus the usual problems of collecting all the
>necessary packages and build them first).
I have a Windows x64 box at home.
I am planning to offer a single file patch for 2.3 and 2.4. As far as
one more 2.5 release, I don't think there's going to be many changes
to the 2.5 branch between now and 2.6/3.0 final - although if there
is, we'll obviously have to do another release.
I wouldn't be horribly surprised if more na
darn. I was hoping to get a 2.5.3 rc and final out soon. Can anyone
else build the binaries?
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 2:43 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It sounds like Wednesday August 13th will not be feasible, so we'll do
>> beta 3 on Wednesday August 20th. I've updated
Hi there Hirokazu Yamamoto,
Some of the other Python developers and myself are interested in knowing
whether or not you'd like to become a Python committer. We've noticed you're
very active in the issue tracker and you always seem to be able to provide
patches when the VC6/VC8 Python builds br
14 matches
Mail list logo
