-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/04/2010 03:28 AM, Alexandre Vassalotti wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
>> I've installed Keychain and invoked it in my .bashrc, and whenever I open a
>> terminal session, it tells me that it found an existing ssh-agen
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
> I'm having some odd problems with my SSH key and Keychain which I hope someone
> on this list can help with.
[snip]
Most of my problems with ssh are permissions related. Make sure the
directory and the individual files under .ssh are "-rw--
On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 22:32:24 +, Vinay Sajip wrote:
> I've installed Keychain and invoked it in my .bashrc, and whenever I open a
> terminal session, it tells me that it found an existing ssh-agent and the
> SSH_AUTH_SOCK and SSH_AGENT_PID seem to be correct. Yet, I get prompted for
> the
> pa
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
> I've installed Keychain and invoked it in my .bashrc, and whenever I open a
> terminal session, it tells me that it found an existing ssh-agent and the
> SSH_AUTH_SOCK and SSH_AGENT_PID seem to be correct.
Are you using Ubuntu? If so, Seahorse
I'm having some odd problems with my SSH key and Keychain which I hope someone
on this list can help with.
When I became a Python committer, I was using Windows, mostly, so I set up an
SSH key using PuTTY and Pageant which worked flawlessly.
More recently, I've being using Linux, mostly, as my pr
Eric Smith wrote:
> Jack Diederich wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
>>> We've been trying to ensure that everyone is on the [list]. To that
>>> end, is there
>>> somewhere I can regularly get an automated list of who has svn
>>> privileges?
>>
>> http://www.python.org/de
Le mercredi 03 mars 2010 13:30:23, Jesse Noller a écrit :
> They're both on this list, right?
MvL gave me the commit access one month ago (at the end of January), but I
only heard about the python-commiters some days ago: when Brett wrote an
emailto the python-dev mailing list.
Brett added me y
On Mar 03, 2010, at 08:19 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
>Yes, very much. Thanks. I'll see if I can find out who's missing. If
>only mailman would give me a list, on one page, of all subscribers, I'd
>be set. Barry?
Alex Martelli
Alexandre Vassalotti
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
"Andrew M. Kuchling"
Andrew
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 08:03:43AM -0500, Eric Smith wrote:
> Jack Diederich wrote:
> But that's manually maintained, right? I was hoping to get something
> generated from the svn configuration.
The SVN configuration comes from a set of SSH keys checked in to a
different SVN repository. This se
Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 14:03, Eric Smith wrote:
Thanks, that's helpful.
But that's manually maintained, right? I was hoping to get something
generated from the svn configuration.
Unfortunately python-committers doesn't have real names for everyone, so
it's impossible to
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:03 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
> Jack Diederich wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
>>>
>>> We've been trying to ensure that everyone is on the [list]. To that end,
>>> is there
>>> somewhere I can regularly get an automated list of who has svn
>>> pr
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 14:03, Eric Smith wrote:
> Thanks, that's helpful.
>
> But that's manually maintained, right? I was hoping to get something
> generated from the svn configuration.
>
> Unfortunately python-committers doesn't have real names for everyone, so
> it's impossible to match up deve
Jack Diederich wrote:
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
We've been trying to ensure that everyone is on the [list]. To that end, is
there
somewhere I can regularly get an automated list of who has svn privileges?
http://www.python.org/dev/committers
Misc/developers.txt
The l
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
>
> We've been trying to ensure that everyone is on the [list]. To that end, is
> there
> somewhere I can regularly get an automated list of who has svn privileges?
http://www.python.org/dev/committers
Misc/developers.txt
The latter has the reas
> On Mar 03, 2010, at 07:30 AM, Jesse Noller wrote:
>
>>They're both on this list, right?
>
> I hope so! All committers are required to be.
Right, but sometimes they fall through the cracks. Subscribing to the list
should be in the "welcome packet" that new committers get, but it's a
somewhat man
>> The revisions in question are Victor's r78597 and Florent's r78621.
>> Since
>> these are not critical fixes, I am going to revert them.
>
> They're both on this list, right?
Yes, they are.
Eric.
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@p
On Mar 03, 2010, at 01:35 PM, Florent Xicluna wrote:
>Do you want me to revert it?
No worries, I've already done it.
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org
On Mar 03, 2010, at 07:30 AM, Jesse Noller wrote:
>They're both on this list, right?
I hope so! All committers are required to be.
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http:/
2010/3/3 Jesse Noller :
>
> They're both on this list, right?
>
Yep... sorry for that.
Do you want me to revert it?
--
Florent
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
On Mar 3, 2010, at 7:28 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
There have been a couple of commits to the Python 2.6 branch since the
2.6.5rc1 tag. Since these were done by Florent and Victor, I just
wanted to
re-iterate that all substantive changes (i.e. anything other than
svnmerge
blocks) need to b
There have been a couple of commits to the Python 2.6 branch since the
2.6.5rc1 tag. Since these were done by Florent and Victor, I just wanted to
re-iterate that all substantive changes (i.e. anything other than svnmerge
blocks) need to be approved while we're in release candidate mode.
To get a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/03/2010 08:13 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> I wouldn't say there are tons of things, but yes, even if we decided
> to punt on the whole EOL thing for now, that probably wouldn't bring
> the switch much closer unless there's also a bunch of people
22 matches
Mail list logo
