Re: [python-committers] [PSF-Board] contrib agreement

2011-06-29 Thread Pat Campbell
Okay Steve, don't confuse me :0. Pat On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Steve Holden wrote: > You meant "grubert", of course. > > It amuses my non-computer friends that people often greet me as "holdenweb" > at PyCon and similar places. > > regards > Steve > > On Jun 29, 2011, at 3:17 PM, Pat Ca

Re: [python-committers] [PSF-Board] contrib agreement

2011-06-29 Thread Steve Holden
You meant "grubert", of course. It amuses my non-computer friends that people often greet me as "holdenweb" at PyCon and similar places. regards Steve On Jun 29, 2011, at 3:17 PM, Pat Campbell wrote: > Thanks for the clarification, Engelbert. -- Steve Holden st...@holdenweb.com _

Re: [python-committers] [PSF-Board] contrib agreement

2011-06-29 Thread Steve Holden
I think grubert is a cool user name! You'll have to be the dev team's evil HR director ... regards Steve On Jun 29, 2011, at 2:54 PM, engelbert gruber wrote: > sorry for the puzzle. at times i thought grubert is cool it is > gru(engel)bert and there is ratbert and dilbert and donot forget majo

Re: [python-committers] [PSF-Board] contrib agreement

2011-06-29 Thread Pat Campbell
Thanks for the clarification, Engelbert. Pat On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 5:54 PM, engelbert gruber < engelbert.gru...@gmail.com> wrote: > sorry for the puzzle. at times i thought grubert is cool it is > gru(engel)bert and there is ratbert and dilbert and donot forget major > grubert. > > On Wed, Jun

Re: [python-committers] [PSF-Board] contrib agreement

2011-06-29 Thread Pat Campbell
Hi Charles-Francois: I do have a hardcopy of your contributor agreement (rec'd on 5/20/2011). However, I would like to add your contributor agreement to the bug tracker. Could you please forward your tracker id and username? Thanks, Pat 2011/6/29 Charles-François Natali > Hi, > > Like Antoine

Re: [python-committers] [PSF-Board] contrib agreement

2011-06-29 Thread Pat Campbell
Thanks for the information Nick.WeI have located Engelbert's tracker profile. Pat On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 5:15 AM, Pat Campbell wrote: > > Hi Engelbert: > > > > Could you please recheck your PSF bug tracker profile. I have tried to > > pul

Re: [python-committers] [PSF-Board] contrib agreement

2011-06-29 Thread Steve Holden
PS; Please accept our apologies for the inconvenience. Now the PSF administrator is able to handle database updates this should be an increasingly infrequent requirement. We appreciate developers helping us (the PSF) to jump through the necessary hoops to make sure that all legal t's are crosse

Re: [python-committers] [PSF-Board] contrib agreement

2011-06-29 Thread Steve Holden
That would be a good idea. In fact any developer who feels they should have the commit-bit enabled but don't should also question whether we received their contributor agreement. It *is* important for the Foundation to hold all agreements on file, since that way we can (we would hope) establish

Re: [python-committers] [PSF-Board] contrib agreement

2011-06-29 Thread Nick Coghlan
2011/6/29 Charles-François Natali : > Hi, > > Like Antoine, I submitted my contributor agreement, but my tracker > profile doesn't reflect it (i.e. "Contributor Form Received" is set to > "No"). > Should I send it again? Yours was recent enough that it should be on file (the misplacement of some o

Re: [python-committers] [PSF-Board] contrib agreement

2011-06-29 Thread Charles-François Natali
Hi, Like Antoine, I submitted my contributor agreement, but my tracker profile doesn't reflect it (i.e. "Contributor Form Received" is set to "No"). Should I send it again? cf 2011/6/28 Pat Campbell : > Hi Engelbert: > > Could you please recheck your PSF bug tracker profile. I have tried to > p

Re: [python-committers] [PSF-Board] contrib agreement

2011-06-29 Thread Nick Coghlan
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 5:15 AM, Pat Campbell wrote: > Hi Engelbert: > > Could you please recheck your PSF bug tracker profile. I have tried to > pull up your profile information with the following information: > > user name: gruber I believe the original email indicated the username was 'grubert