On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Petri Lehtinen wrote:
>
> From hg help glossary:
>
> If a named branch has no topological heads, it is considered to be
> inactive.
>
> So AFAICS, this just means that 3.2 has been merged to default (which
> always should be the case).
Got it. I got confused
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Petri Lehtinen wrote:
> Senthil Kumaran wrote:
>> I think, there is something wrong with state of hg.python.org at the moment.
>>
>> On a fresh clone from hg.python.org
>>
>> $hg clone ssh://h...@hg.python.org/cpython cpython
>>
>> If I do, hg branches, the 3.2 is s
Senthil Kumaran wrote:
> I think, there is something wrong with state of hg.python.org at the moment.
>
> On a fresh clone from hg.python.org
>
> $hg clone ssh://h...@hg.python.org/cpython cpython
>
> If I do, hg branches, the 3.2 is shown as inactive. Did something
> change recently?
>From hg
2012/1/4 Senthil Kumaran :
> I think, there is something wrong with state of hg.python.org at the moment.
>
> On a fresh clone from hg.python.org
>
> $hg clone ssh://h...@hg.python.org/cpython cpython
>
> If I do, hg branches, the 3.2 is shown as inactive. Did something
> change recently?
It just
I think, there is something wrong with state of hg.python.org at the moment.
On a fresh clone from hg.python.org
$hg clone ssh://h...@hg.python.org/cpython cpython
If I do, hg branches, the 3.2 is shown as inactive. Did something
change recently?
(env27)bash-3.2$ hg branches
default
