I finally just got to reading the release page and noticed two notes that
should be updated:
· Windows users: If installing Python 3.5.0b1 as a non-privileged user,
you may need to escalate to administrator privileges to install an update to
your C runtime libraries.
Should be “3.5.0b4
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 00:11:53 +0200, Jesus Cea wrote:
> On 29/07/15 18:50, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > I believe that in this particular case, the bug was fixed (by tightening
> > the requirements for headers) because the bug can lead to security
> > vulnerabilities. I think you can find more by Go
On 29/07/15 18:50, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I believe that in this particular case, the bug was fixed (by tightening
> the requirements for headers) because the bug can lead to security
> vulnerabilities. I think you can find more by Googling for keywords like
> "http header injection". The more r
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:41:09 -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 7/29/2015 1:01 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
> > On 30 July 2015 at 04:50, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> >> I believe that in this particular case, the bug was fixed (by tightening
> >> the
> >> requirements for headers) because the bug can lea
For reference, a similar bug fix also introduced incompatibilities with the
Chishop service: http://bugs.python.org/issue23899
On Jul 29, 2015, at 12:06, Jesus Cea mailto:j...@jcea.es>> wrote:
Yesterday I upgraded one of my computer to 2.7.10 and a program working
for years failed.
The problem
On 7/29/2015 1:01 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 30 July 2015 at 04:50, Guido van Rossum wrote:
I believe that in this particular case, the bug was fixed (by tightening the
requirements for headers) because the bug can lead to security
vulnerabilities. I think you can find more by Googling for ke
When in doubt, such discussions should be escalated to python-dev. I don't
know if this one was, though I vaguely recall seeing it discussed
somewhere. Anyway, since it's been released, it should stay in.
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 7:31 PM, Robert Collins
wrote:
> On 30 July 2015 at 05:20, Eric Sno
On 30 July 2015 at 05:20, Eric Snow wrote:
>
> On Jul 29, 2015 11:08 AM, "Robert Collins"
> wrote:
>>
>> On 30 July 2015 at 04:50, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> > The more recent Python 2.7 bugfix releases have
>> > specific exemptions from the backwards compatibility requirements for
>> > security
On Jul 29, 2015 11:08 AM, "Robert Collins"
wrote:
>
> On 30 July 2015 at 04:50, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > The more recent Python 2.7 bugfix releases have
> > specific exemptions from the backwards compatibility requirements for
> > security fixes -- because their lifespan will still be many yea
On 30 July 2015 at 04:50, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I believe that in this particular case, the bug was fixed (by tightening the
> requirements for headers) because the bug can lead to security
> vulnerabilities. I think you can find more by Googling for keywords like
> "http header injection". Th
I believe that in this particular case, the bug was fixed (by tightening
the requirements for headers) because the bug can lead to security
vulnerabilities. I think you can find more by Googling for keywords like
"http header injection". The more recent Python 2.7 bugfix releases have
specific exem
Yesterday I upgraded one of my computer to 2.7.10 and a program working
for years failed.
The problem is this:
"""
http=httplib.HTTPConnection("127.0.0.1",8081)
http.request("GET","/X/%f" %last_t, "", \
{"Authorization":"Basic %s" %base64.encodestring("%s:%s" %(a,b))})
"""
base64.encodestr
12 matches
Mail list logo
