On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 10:07 PM Raymond Hettinger <
raymond.hettin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mar 4, 2016, at 4:07 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> >
> > I guess I'm just worried about the health of this project. I'm doing
> what I can through the migration to GitHub to make it
> On Mar 4, 2016, at 4:07 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
> I guess I'm just worried about the health of this project. I'm doing what I
> can through the migration to GitHub to make it easier for others to get
> involved while making it easier for us to accept the work of others,
On Fri, 04 Mar 2016 21:31:44 +, Brett Cannon wrote:
> I guess I'm just worried about the health of this project. I'm doing what I
> can through the migration to GitHub to make it easier for others to get
> involved while making it easier for us to accept the work of others,
On 03/04/2016 04:07 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
We also still have no female or minority members.
Well, I'n not female, but I am of Native American / Latino descent. So
you have at least one. :)
And yes, those extremely low numbers of new committers are a bit
worrying. :(
--
~Ethan~
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> When I thought about this the other week after a
> cranky email to python-dev appeared I realized that the CoC isn't exactly
> advertised so that people know they shouldn't act mean here like they might
> in other corners of
On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 at 15:07 R. David Murray wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Mar 2016 21:31:44 +, Brett Cannon wrote:
> > The discussion about the Code of Conduct has sputtered out, so I'm going
> to
> > assume those who care to speak up have at this point. It
On 03/04/2016 03:07 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
> I guess I have one more thing to say.
[snip]
> [*] I think it is a feeling of annoyance, like I'm being nagged for
> no good reason [...]
I'm inclined to agree, but some bureaucracy is the price of success. Be
grateful somebody else is
On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 at 14:04 M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> Brett,
>
> I don't think that spamming all MLs, Github accounts, etc.
> with CoC notices will help anyone.
>
Which is not what I'm suggesting nor would I want to do unless it's a
stated change in policy so people feel properly
On Fri, 04 Mar 2016 21:31:44 +, Brett Cannon wrote:
> The discussion about the Code of Conduct has sputtered out, so I'm going to
> assume those who care to speak up have at this point. It seems to me that
> the general agreement is that putting python-dev and
The discussion about the Code of Conduct has sputtered out, so I'm going to
assume those who care to speak up have at this point. It seems to me that
the general agreement is that putting python-dev and bugs.python.org under
the CoC might not solve any real issues we currently have, but it won't
10 matches
Mail list logo