On 21 January 2017 at 23:32, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Le 21/01/2017 à 12:27, Nick Coghlan a écrit :
>>
>> The Red Hat python-maint folks (Peter Viktorin et al) similarly tried
>> to time things so there was a window to provide feedback from Fedora
>> Rawhide on a beta release prior to the final 3
Le 21/01/2017 à 12:27, Nick Coghlan a écrit :
>
> The Red Hat python-maint folks (Peter Viktorin et al) similarly tried
> to time things so there was a window to provide feedback from Fedora
> Rawhide on a beta release prior to the final 3.6.0 release, but it
> unfortunately ended up not being pr
On 20 January 2017 at 21:45, Victor Stinner wrote:
> What do you mean by "author"? As you wrote, Python is now 26 years
> old, so it had a very long history, and each file has a very long list
> of "authors". I guess that you mean more a "maintainer".
>
> My problem is that I'm not aware of any ex
On 21 January 2017 at 09:02, Lukasz Langa wrote:
>> On Jan 20, 2017, at 9:26 AM, Yury Selivanov wrote:
>> I think that we need to become less conservative about
>> development of CPython internals. At this point it's impossible
>> to make CPython any faster without invasive refactorings, and
>>
On 01/20/2017 04:03 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
2017-01-21 0:14 GMT+01:00 Andrew Dalke :
For this one bug, I agree with the interpretation that it was handled
with a cavalier attitude. I don't feel like it's being treated with
the seriousness it should.
I don't understand why you are saying
