Re: [python-committers] 4 weeks with the new workflow: what needs changing?

2017-03-11 Thread Donald Stufft
> On Mar 11, 2017, at 9:30 PM, Martin Panter wrote: > > I am also aware of > > but > haven’t added myself there yet. Yea this is what I meant,

Re: [python-committers] 4 weeks with the new workflow: what needs changing?

2017-03-11 Thread Mariatta Wijaya
> > Requiring Travis to pass Yes please. Cherry-picking working out? Works for me. And I've done a lot of this :) are the labels for cherry-picking working out? I like the [3.6] Prefix (Thanks Berker for suggesting it originally) I think [cherry-pick for 3.6] label is still useful as a

Re: [python-committers] 4 weeks with the new workflow: what needs changing?

2017-03-11 Thread Donald Stufft
> On Mar 11, 2017, at 3:03 AM, Zachary Ware > wrote: > >> >> Is the mention bot helpful? (Our config is at >> https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/master/.mention-bot >> and the docs are >> at

Re: [python-committers] 4 weeks with the new workflow: what needs changing?

2017-03-11 Thread Zachary Ware
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: > Requiring Travis to pass (I really don't want to turn this off as we already > had a broken build when I temporarily turned it off at someone's request > when Travis was backed up from the AWS S3 outage; I also don't plan to