On Mar 16, 2017, at 04:14 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>Ah, you didn't say you wanted this to be a status check. :) Do we want to
>go so far as that rather than a comment or PR template?
I like it for that on my other projects, so I'm pretty sure I'd like that for
CPython. I'm a big fan of more
On 2017-03-16 12:16 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 at 20:24 R. David Murray > wrote:
On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 22:56:33 -0400, Yury Selivanov
> wrote:
> It's not
On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 at 20:24 R. David Murray wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 22:56:33 -0400, Yury Selivanov <
> yselivanov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It's not just long waiting times (although it's a huge factor), it's
> > that you have to create temporary branches for
On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 at 17:03 Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Mar 16, 2017, at 12:00 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
> >But that would require that external contributors know to set that label
> >ahead of time and I'm willing to bet most won't.
>
> Not if the test has a retry feature. Your
On 16.03.2017 00:49, Brett Cannon wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 at 08:44 Berker Peksağ wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:11 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, 12 Mar 2017 at 06:33 M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
On