Re: [python-committers] Revert changes which break too many buildbots

On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 at 13:24 Ethan Furman wrote: > On 06/16/2017 09:48 AM, Brett Cannon wrote: > > > Maybe we should amend PEP 11 to say that whomever volunteers to maintain > a platform > > must make sure that platform's buildbot is not red for longer than a > month [...] >

[python-committers] Bedevere now automatically removes "needs backport to *" labels

When you create a backport PR, if the title is formatted as, e.g. "[3.6] stuff that changed (GH-1234)", then Bedevere will remove the "needs backport to 3.6" label on the GH-1234 PR and leave a comment linking to the backport PR that triggered the label removal.

Re: [python-committers] Revert changes which break too many buildbots

2017-06-16 10:37 GMT+02:00 Nick Coghlan : > Hopefully reversions will continue to be rare (since relatively few > changes are likely to be as platform dependent as PEP 538, and > Windows/*nix differences are already covered in pre-merge CI), but > when they do come up, the

Re: [python-committers] Revert changes which break too many buildbots

On 15 June 2017 at 23:38, Victor Stinner wrote: > 2017-06-15 5:31 GMT+02:00 Nick Coghlan : >> For example, something that would be genuinely helpful would be a bot >> monitoring PR comments that could automate the "custom-build" dance >> for core