Re: [python-committers] My (positive) feedback on the new CPython workflow

2017-07-19 Thread Barry Warsaw
Ah, how deservedly superficial my title is: % python3 flufl.py File "flufl.py", line 3 1 <> 2 ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax % cat flufl.py from __future__ import barry_as_FLUFL 1 <> 2 -Barry > On Jul 19, 2017, at 11:31, Victor Stinner wrote: > >

Re: [python-committers] Dismiss review if a PR is modified

2017-07-19 Thread Brett Cannon
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 at 08:18 R. David Murray wrote: > On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 23:13:41 -, Brett Cannon wrote: > > Do realize that setting is part of requiring a review for pull requests: > > >

Re: [python-committers] My (positive) feedback on the new CPython workflow

2017-07-19 Thread Victor Stinner
2017-07-19 17:23 GMT+02:00 Barry Warsaw : > That, and bringing back the diamond operator for realz. For people who don't know the "diamond operator" like me ;-) haypo@selma$ python3 Python 3.5.3 (default, May 10 2017, 15:05:55) >>> from __future__ import barry_as_FLUFL >>> 1 !=

Re: [python-committers] My (positive) feedback on the new CPython workflow

2017-07-19 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jul 18, 2017, at 11:01 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: >It's very obvious, Barry, that you're playing the long game of trying to >line up GitLab as the next platform once we grow tired of GitHub and need >to switch in a few years. I'm on to you. ;) That, and bringing back the diamond operator for

Re: [python-committers] Dismiss review if a PR is modified

2017-07-19 Thread R. David Murray
On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 23:13:41 -, Brett Cannon wrote: > Do realize that setting is part of requiring a review for pull requests: > https://help.github.com/articles/enabling-required-reviews-for-pull-requests/. > So in order to get this we would require all PRs, core dev or