We are going to extend for 48 hours the deadline for 3.7.0rc1, that is, until
2018-05-23 23:59 AOE. While we have made tremendous progress towards the
release candidate over the past week especially with the huge efforts at the
PyCon US Sprints, we still have some important issues to resolve.
On Sun, 20 May 2018 at 10:43 Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On May 20, 2018, at 10:19, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> >
> > IIRC, the general reaction was that it was definitely worth exploring,
> but that it would be a lot of work and require solutions to a lot of
> problems to make sure people's workflows we
On May 20, 2018, at 10:19, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
> IIRC, the general reaction was that it was definitely worth exploring, but
> that it would be a lot of work and require solutions to a lot of problems to
> make sure people's workflows weren't too impacted, so we'd need a much more
> detail
On Sun, May 20, 2018, 03:18 Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Le 19/05/2018 à 02:10, Victor Stinner a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I failed to get the microphone after Mariatta's secret talk about
> > moving Python issues from bugs.python.org (Roundup) to GitHub.
>
> A "secret talk"? What is that?
>
She gave
On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 10:56:21AM +0200, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> If that's on the table, it seems to me that categorization, sorting and
> filtering on GitHub issues is rather poor, while the basic UI experience
> (editing messages, etc.) is better. Also, I think customization (e.g.
> of the defa
Le 19/05/2018 à 02:10, Victor Stinner a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I failed to get the microphone after Mariatta's secret talk about
> moving Python issues from bugs.python.org (Roundup) to GitHub.
A "secret talk"? What is that?
> I don't have a strong opinion about moving issues to GitHub.
If that's o
