On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 10:07 PM Brett Cannon wrote:
[..]
>> Ideally Guido would accept the PEP but I'm not sure if he is willing to. If
>> that is indeed the case then how should this be done so that the document is
>> universally accepted by all committers?
>
>
> In my ideal scenario, people w
On 14 July 2018 at 19:36, Paul Moore wrote:
> On 14 July 2018 at 08:05, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> So stealing Brett's excellent suggestion of "Design Steward" as a
>> BDFL-independent term for the current BDFL-Delegate role, a potential
>> PEP 1 amendment for the appointment process would be:
>
> I'
On Sat, Jul 14, 2018, 15:56 Brett Cannon, wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018, 17:11 Carol Willing, wrote:
>
>> On Jul 13, 2018, at 11:39 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 13 Jul 2018 at 03:44 Victor Stinner wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> 2018-07-12 19:12 GMT+02:00 Mariatta Wijaya :
>>>
>>>
>>> *
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018, 13:14 Neil Schemenauer,
wrote:
> On 2018-07-13, Ethan Furman wrote:
> > I stopped reading the PEP 572 threads once it was painfully
> > obvious that almost all new replies were just saying the same
> > things over and over and over...
>
> Perhaps this can be seen as a kind o
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018, 17:11 Carol Willing, wrote:
> On Jul 13, 2018, at 11:39 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
> On Fri, 13 Jul 2018 at 03:44 Victor Stinner wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2018-07-12 19:12 GMT+02:00 Mariatta Wijaya :
>>
>>
>> * Diversity. Last years, the BDFL was a strong player to enhance the
On Sat, 14 Jul 2018 at 00:16 Łukasz Langa wrote:
>
> > On Jul 13, 2018, at 7:54 PM, Tim Peters wrote:
> >
> > If there are 3 Elders [snip]
>
>
> It looks like the number 3 is popular in this context. What makes it so
> attractive?
>
I think because it's small enough to be manageable and have co
[Tim]
> > If there are 3 Elders [snip]
>
[Łukasz Langa]
> It looks like the number 3 is popular in this context. What makes it so
> attractive?
>
Likely because it was the first specific non-insane number someone
mentioned. It helps to be concrete, but I don't know that anyone is wedded
to 3.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 4:58 PM Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> Now that PEP 572 is done, I don't ever want to have to fight so hard for a
> PEP and find that so many people despise my decisions.
>
> I would like to remove myself entirely from the decision process. I'll still
> be there for a while
On 14 July 2018 at 08:05, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> So stealing Brett's excellent suggestion of "Design Steward" as a
> BDFL-independent term for the current BDFL-Delegate role, a potential
> PEP 1 amendment for the appointment process would be:
I've only got one peripheral point to make here, but ca
> On Jul 13, 2018, at 7:54 PM, Tim Peters wrote:
>
> If there are 3 Elders [snip]
It looks like the number 3 is popular in this context. What makes it so
attractive?
I see a bunch of problems with such a low number, like the ability for a single
corporation to take over the design process o
Hi folks,
While I think the threads suggesting that we treat Guido's retirement
as an opportunity to conduct a critical self-review of our community
governance structures and practices are an excellent idea, I also want
to note that there's only a relatively minimal change required to PEP
1 to per
11 matches
Mail list logo
