[Chris Jerdonek [
> A major problem with approval voting IMO (and range and score) is that
> it constrains how voters can express themselves:
>
Well, that's an objection I never heard before - and expect I'll never hear
again ;-)
To the contrary, range/score voting are the _most_ expressive, all
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 10:46 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Le 23/10/2018 à 18:05, Tim Peters a écrit :
> > The rangevoting site has a great deal of info about all sorts of voting
> > systems. Over a decade ago, Ka-Ping Yee (who used to be very active in
> > Python development) ran some _visual_ vot
Le 23/10/2018 à 18:05, Tim Peters a écrit :
>
> [Donald Stufft mailto:don...@stufft.io>>]
>
> ...
> I’m struggling to find a resource besides that doesn’t also include
> shilling for another voting system or isn’t a lengthy paper
> but https://rangevoting.org/IRVpartic.html gives
[Tim, quoting Ping]> The following images visually demonstrate how
Plurality penalizes centrist
> > candidates and Borda favours them; how Approval and Condorcet yield
> nearly
> > identical results; and how the Hare method yields extremely strange
> > behaviour. ...
[Steven D'Aprano][
> Why a
> On Oct 23, 2018, at 1:14 PM, Tim Peters wrote:
>
> [Alex Martelli mailto:al...@google.com>>]
> While I suspect most participants are aware of this, just in care some don't
> I thought I'd just point out that it's futile to look for a "perfect" voting
> system -- Kenneth Arrow proved that lo
[Alex Martelli ]
> While I suspect most participants are aware of this, just in care some
> don't I thought I'd just point out that it's futile to look for a "perfect"
> voting system -- Kenneth Arrow proved that long ago, see
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow%27s_impossibility_theorem
>
Yup!
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:05:58AM -0500, Tim Peters wrote:
> The rangevoting site has a great deal of info about all sorts of voting
> systems. Over a decade ago, Ka-Ping Yee (who used to be very active in
> Python development) ran some _visual_ voting simulations on 5 popular
> systems, which s
While I suspect most participants are aware of this, just in care some
don't I thought I'd just point out that it's futile to look for a "perfect"
voting system -- Kenneth Arrow proved that long ago, see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow%27s_impossibility_theorem
Alex
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 9:
[Donald Stufft ]
> ...
> I’m struggling to find a resource besides that doesn’t also include
> shilling for another voting system or isn’t a lengthy paper but
> https://rangevoting.org/IRVpartic.html gives an example and
> https://rangevoting.org/TarrIrv.html is a more complex example.
>
The rang
> On Oct 23, 2018, at 7:56 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
>
> Le 23/10/2018 à 13:55, Donald Stufft a écrit :
>>
>> We’re using IRV and I accept that, but I just want to point out that IRV
>> still has a form vote splitting (in electoral parlance, vote splitting
>> is the “favorite betrayal criter
Le 23/10/2018 à 13:55, Donald Stufft a écrit :
>
> We’re using IRV and I accept that, but I just want to point out that IRV
> still has a form vote splitting (in electoral parlance, vote splitting
> is the “favorite betrayal criterion”
> - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JtKAScORevQ. IRV only pro
> On Oct 23, 2018, at 7:06 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 at 06:38, Łukasz Langa wrote:
>>
>> The voting procedure is described in PEP 8001. I flipped it from "Draft" to
>> "Active" without further changes a few minutes ago. That's in the interest
>> of giving everybody eno
Le 23/10/2018 à 13:06, Nick Coghlan a écrit :
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 at 06:38, Łukasz Langa wrote:
>>
>> The voting procedure is described in PEP 8001. I flipped it from "Draft" to
>> "Active" without further changes a few minutes ago. That's in the interest
>> of giving everybody enough lead ti
On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 at 06:38, Łukasz Langa wrote:
>
> The voting procedure is described in PEP 8001. I flipped it from "Draft" to
> "Active" without further changes a few minutes ago. That's in the interest of
> giving everybody enough lead time as well as resolving the situation "well
> before
14 matches
Mail list logo
