[python-committers] Re: Performance benchmarks for 3.9

2020-10-15 Thread M.-A. Lemburg
On 15.10.2020 15:50, Victor Stinner wrote: > Le mer. 14 oct. 2020 à 17:59, Antoine Pitrou a écrit : >> unpack-sequence is a micro-benchmark. (...) > > I suggest removing it. > > I removed other similar micro-benchmarks from pyperformance in the > past, since they can easily be misunderstood and

[python-committers] Re: Performance benchmarks for 3.9

2020-10-15 Thread Victor Stinner
Le mer. 14 oct. 2020 à 17:59, Antoine Pitrou a écrit : > unpack-sequence is a micro-benchmark. (...) I suggest removing it. I removed other similar micro-benchmarks from pyperformance in the past, since they can easily be misunderstood and misleading. For curious people, I'm keeping a

[python-committers] Re: Performance benchmarks for 3.9

2020-10-15 Thread M.-A. Lemburg
On 14.10.2020 16:14, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > Le 14/10/2020 à 15:16, Pablo Galindo Salgado a écrit : >> Hi! >> >> I have updated the branch benchmarks in the pyperformance server and now >> they include 3.9. There are >> some benchmarks that are faster but on the other hand some benchmarks >> are