[python-committers] Re: Publish better than md5sums of Python builds?

2021-03-17 Thread M.-A. Lemburg
On 17.03.2021 18:53, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021, at 09:29, Victor Stinner wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 9:16 PM Gregory P. Smith wrote: >>> The benefit of listing the sha256 for files is that it prevents this >>> question coming up again and again because md5 is old

[python-committers] Re: Publish better than md5sums of Python builds?

2021-03-17 Thread Benjamin Peterson
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021, at 09:29, Victor Stinner wrote: > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 9:16 PM Gregory P. Smith wrote: > > The benefit of listing the sha256 for files is that it prevents this > > question coming up again and again because md5 is old and rightfully on the > > "never use" list for man

[python-committers] Re: PyCon US passes for core devs

2021-03-17 Thread Mariatta
This is great! Thank you! On Wed., Mar. 17, 2021, 8:23 a.m. Ewa Jodlowska, wrote: > Hi! > > As some of you may have seen, PyCon US > launched registration. We have dedicated passes set aside for core devs as > part of our financial aid program. > > If you are interes

[python-committers] PyCon US passes for core devs

2021-03-17 Thread Ewa Jodlowska
Hi! As some of you may have seen, PyCon US launched registration. We have dedicated passes set aside for core devs as part of our financial aid program. If you are interested in a free pass to PyCon US, please apply for financial aid via your dashboard once you create

[python-committers] Re: Publish better than md5sums of Python builds?

2021-03-17 Thread Ned Deily
On Mar 17, 2021, at 10:29, Victor Stinner wrote: > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 9:16 PM Gregory P. Smith wrote: >> The benefit of listing the sha256 for files is that it prevents this >> question coming up again and again because md5 is old and rightfully on the >> "never use" list for many people.

[python-committers] Re: Publish better than md5sums of Python builds?

2021-03-17 Thread Victor Stinner
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 9:16 PM Gregory P. Smith wrote: > The benefit of listing the sha256 for files is that it prevents this question > coming up again and again because md5 is old and rightfully on the "never > use" list for many people. Even if there are situations where it is fine as > an